Abstract

Background and PurposeUnexpected liver volume reductions occurred during trials of liver SBRT and concurrent sorafenib. The aims were to accumulate liver SBRT doses to assess the impact of these anatomic variations on normal tissue dose parameters and toxicity. Materials and MethodsThirty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastases treated on trials of liver SBRT (30–57 Gy, 6 fractions) and concurrent sorafenib were analyzed. SBRT doses were accumulated using biomechanical deformable registration of daily cone-beam CT. Dose deviations (accumulated-planned) for normal tissues were compared for patients with liver volume reductions > 100 cc versus stable volumes, and accumulated doses were reported for three patients with grade 3–5 luminal gastrointestinal toxicities. ResultsPatients with reduced (N = 12) liver volumes had larger mean deviations of 0.4–1.3 Gy in normal tissues, versus −0.2–0.4 Gy for stable cases (N = 20), P > 0.05. Deviations > 5% of the prescribed dose occurred in both groups. Two HCC patients with toxicities to small and large bowel had liver volume reductions and deviations to the maximum dose of 4% (accumulated 36.9 Gy) and 3% (accumulated 33.4 Gy) to these organs respectively. Another HCC patient with a toxicity of unknown location plus tumor rupture, had stable liver volumes and deviations to luminal organs of −6% to 4.5% (accumulated < 30.5 Gy). ConclusionLiver volume reductions during SBRT and concurrent sorafenib were associated with larger increases in accumulated dose to normal tissues versus stable liver volumes. These dosimetric changes may have further contributed to toxicities in HCC patients who have higher baseline risks.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.