Abstract

Multiacinar regenerative nodules are benign hepatocellular nodules related to vascular disturbances of the liver. Theystrongly resemble conventional focal nodular hyperplasia but are connected to different clinical settings, typically chronic liver disease.The purpose of the present study was to describe the key imaging features of these lesions and compare them with a control arm offocal nodular hyperplasia. A blinded consensus review of liver magnetic resonance consisting of 26 cases of multiacinar regenerativenodules and 25 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia was performed. Lesion size, shape, margins, structure, T1 and T2 signal intensity,diffusion and contrast-enhanced features (including hepatobiliary phase), presence of a central scar and of a peripheral hypointenserim were compared between the two groups. Significant differences between multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia included size (median 2.35cm, IQR: 2.13, vs 6.00 cm, IQR: 5.20, respectively, p < 0.001), presence of a peripheral hypointense rim after contrast (n = 9 vs n = 2cases, p = 0.038) and of a central scar (n = 9 vs n = 20, p = 0.002). There were no other significant differences. Overall multiacinar regenerative nodules and focal nodular hyperplasia have very similar imaging features but lack of acentral scar and presence of a hypointense rim should suggest a diagnosis of multiacinar regenerative nodules. Recognition of the imaging findings of multiacinar regenerative nodules can explain some atypical cases of focal nodularhyperplasia, avoiding unnecessary biopsies. They may also be the trigger to investigate an unsuspected underlying liver vascularabnormality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call