Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and interobserver agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (LR-TR) v2018 using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and methodsA total of 54 patients who underwent DCE-MRI and DWI after locoregional treatment of 81 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions from September 2020 to July 2021 were included. There were 47 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 63.9 ± 9.2 (SD) years (age range: 23–77 years). Locoregional treatments included transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (53/81; 65.4%), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (25/81; 30.9%) and microwave ablation (MWA) (3/81; 3.7%). Two independent radiologists retrospectively evaluated DCE-MRI examinations obtained after locoregional treatment using LR-TR, and then three months later both radiologists reevaluated DCE-MRI examinations with DWI. Interobserver agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa test. Diagnostic performances were evaluated in term of sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve (AUC) using a composite standard of reference that included results of histopathological examinations and follow-up findings. ResultsUsing DCE-MRI alone, observer 1 had 83.9% sensitivity (26/31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66–95%), 88% specificity (44/50; 95% CI: 76–95%) and 86.4% accuracy (70/81; 95%CI: 77–93%), and observer 2 had 71% sensitivity (22/31; 95% CI: 52–86%), 92% specificity (46/50; 95% CI: 81–98%) and 83.9% accuracy (68/81; 95% CI: 74–91%). For the diagnosis of viable tumors using DCE-MRI with DWI, observer 1 and observer 2 had 87.1% (27/31; 95% CI: 70–96%) and 74.2% (23/31; 95% CI: 55–88%) sensitivity, respectively. The diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI with DWI yielded an AUC (0.875; 95% CI: 0.789–0.962) not different from that of DCE-MRI without DWI (0.859; 95% CI: 0.768–0.951) (P = 0.317). Interobserver agreement for arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, enhancement similar to pretreatment and DWI findings in all treated HCCs was almost perfect (kappa = 0.815, 0.837, 0.826 and 0.81 respectively). Agreement between observers for LR-TR category was substantial (kappa = 0.795; 95% CI: 0.665–0.924). Interobserver agreement for size of viable HCC was excellent (ICC = 0.938; 95% CI: 0.904–0.960). ConclusionLR-TR using DCE-MRI alone or DCE-MRI with DWI are both accurate for detecting viable HCC lesions after locoregional treatment, with no differences in diagnostic performance and excellent interobserver agreement.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call