Abstract
Horizontally curved, steel girder bridges are often used in our modern infrastructural system. The curve in the bridge allows for a smother transition for traffic, which creates better road travel. However, some of the disadvantages of horizontally curved bridges are that they are more difficult to analyze, design, and sometimes construct in comparison to conventional straight bridges. This study focuses on a three-span, curved steel I-girder bridge which was tested under three boundary condition states to determine it's response to live load. The measured live-load strains were used to calibrate a finite-element model. The finite-element design moments and distribution factors for the three condition states were then compared with the results based on the V-load method. These different boundary conditions provided the researchers a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact that these changes had on the bridges behavior. It was found that while the V-load method produced positive bending moments that were close to the finite-element moments for some of the girders, this was a result of the V-load moment being unconservative and the distribution factor being conservative.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
