“Little Nudge”: an evaluation of the feasibility of using activity-reminder computer software in office workers to increase movement at work

Abstract

Event Abstract Back to Event “Little Nudge”: an evaluation of the feasibility of using activity-reminder computer software in office workers to increase movement at work Emily Tims1* 1 Little Nudge, United Kingdom BACKGROUND The amount of time people spend sedentary is linked to health risks, including mortality. This link remains even in people who exercise (Van der Ploegg et al., 2012). There are unique physiological effects that occur due to being sedentary, which are separate from the physiological responses caused by structured exercise (Hamilton et al., 2007). Breaking up periods of sitting is linked with beneficial physiological responses, including reducing post-prandial glucose and insulin responses (Peddie et al., 2013). Novel solutions for facilitating interruptions to periods of sitting in the workplace are needed. DESCRIPTION Aim: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of using online exercise-reminder software for increasing frequency of movement in office workers. Design: A follow-up investigation of the impact of “Little Nudge” computer software. Participants were 118 office workers. Intervention: This consisted of computer software which reminded users to ‘stand up and move’, as well as other healthy activities. Newsletters and posters were also used to promote engagement with the software. Outcomes: These were measured via an online questionnaire at baseline and after using the software for three months or more. The primary outcome was self-reported frequency of movement. Secondary outcomes included self-reported frequency of eye-resting, mind-resting, self-reported back pain, neck pain and headaches. Qualitative feedback was collected about users’ experiences of using the software. Results: The following outcomes measured at baseline and three months from 118 participants’ (87 female, 30 male, 1 unknown) were analysed using marginal homogeneity tests. Primary outcome: Self-reported frequency of movement increased significantly (p = 0.000). Secondary outcomes: Self-reported eye-resting increased (p = 0.000), self-reported mind-resting increased but not significantly (p = 0.107). Self-reported back pain (p=0.013) and headaches reduced significantly (p =0.000). Self-reported neck pain (p = 0.218) reduced but not significantly. CONCLUSION This is an acceptable intervention, which increased self-reported frequency of movement and reduced self-reported painful symptoms. There is no control comparison or objective measures of movement, so future research is recommended to assess the effects on different samples using objective measures of movement. References Hamilton, M. T., Hamilton, D. G., & Zderic, T. W. (2007). Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes, 56(11), 2655-2667. doi:10.2337/db07-0882 Peddie, M. C., Bone, J. L., Rehrer, N. J., Skeaff, C. M., Gray, A. R., & Perry, T. L. (2013). Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr, 98(2), 358-366. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.051763 van der Ploeg, H. P., Chey, T., Korda, R. J., Banks, E., & Bauman, A. (2012). Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med, 172(6), 494-500. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2174 Keywords: break-reminder, exercise-reminder, Sedentary behaviour, office-workers, computer users Conference: 2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing, London, United Kingdom, 24 Feb - 25 Feb, 2016. Presentation Type: Poster presentation Topic: Practitioner Citation: Tims E (2016). “Little Nudge”: an evaluation of the feasibility of using activity-reminder computer software in office workers to increase movement at work. Front. Public Health. Conference Abstract: 2nd Behaviour Change Conference: Digital Health and Wellbeing. doi: 10.3389/conf.FPUBH.2016.01.00033 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 02 Dec 2015; Published Online: 09 Jan 2016. * Correspondence: Miss. Emily Tims, Little Nudge, London, United Kingdom, emily@littlenudge.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Emily Tims Google Emily Tims Google Scholar Emily Tims PubMed Emily Tims Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.