Little data is often enough for distance-based outlier detection

Abstract

Many real-world use cases benefit from fast training and prediction times, and much research went into speeding up distance-based outlier detection methods to millions of data points. Contrary to popular belief, our findings suggest that little data is often enough for distance-based outlier detection models. We show that using only a tiny fraction of the data to train distance-based outlier detection models often leads to no significant reduction in predictive performance and detection variance over a wide range of tabular datasets. Furthermore, we compare a data reduction based on random subsampling and clustering-based prototypes and show that both approaches yield similar outlier detection results. Simple random subsampling, thus, proves to be a useful benchmark and baseline for future research on speeding up distance-based outlier detection.