Abstract
What makes some novels literary? There is little agreement within literary studies on this question. The two main approaches focus either on text-intrinsic factors (e.g., aesthetic, stylistic), or text-extrinsic social factors (e.g., author prestige, critics). Until now, there has not been a comprehensive study taking both text-intrinsic and social factors into account. The project The Riddle of Literary Quality examines both factors by connecting literary texts to the appreciation of those texts: can we identify textual characteristics that are connected to readers’ literary appraisal of texts? In this paper, we describe the development of The National Reader Survey and present some results. The National Reader Survey is a large online survey of Dutch readers with about 14,000 respondents; its purpose is to collect readers’ literary appraisal of texts. We asked readers to rate both read and unread novels on a scale of 1–7 for their literary and overall quality. The agreement amongst respondents on which recent Dutch language novels are of high literary quality and which are not was greater than expected. Motivations respondents gave for their ratings show that the notion of literary quality is a familiar one and respondents most commonly relate it to two elements: the first is the text itself—style, structure, plot and layers; and the second is genre—if a novel is considered a ‘genre’ novel (e.g., suspense, romantic, fantasy), its chances of obtaining a high rating on literary quality are small. These results indicate how entwined social and text-intrinsic factors are. We also touch upon project results which make use of the survey data.
Highlights
Debates about literary quality involve not just what the term precisely constitutes, and whether it is even a legitimate concept to begin with
For the survey we present in this contribution, this informed our choice in using a corpus consisting of titles with a mostly high economic value, and containing enough titles regarded as having sufficient literary prestige to make a useful comparison
The results will be discussed in the order of which the questions were asked in the survey: first, reader roles, the ratings on a scale of literary quality and overall quality, among books read and books unread, and the motivations respondents provided for one of their ratings
Summary
Debates about literary quality involve not just what the term precisely constitutes, and whether it is even a legitimate concept to begin with. Sociologists have claimed the concept to be basically void of meaning (e.g., Bourdieu, 1984), whereas feminists argued against the exclusionary function it performs (e.g., Ellmann, 1968) Notwithstanding such theoretical considerations, the practice of applying notions of literary quality is still very common in the appraisal of fictional works, but its characteristics are not well understood. The digital humanities project The Riddle of Literary Quality aims to address this by examining two aspects of literary quality: the existing perceptions of literary quality, as well as the actual texts of novels and how these two aspects are connected. We do this by applying a bottom-up empirical approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (pp. 32–40). . https://www
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
