Abstract
BackgroundAdapting instruction to individual students' needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students' reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers' instructional support through instructional management are considered.MethodsThe data were collected in the context of Finland where first graders' reading skills show great variation at school entry but rapid progress. Students (n = 616) were individually tested on their reading skills, and literacy lessons in 35 classrooms were video recorded in the autumn of first grade. Multilevel path analyses were conducted to examine the classroom‐level associations between reading skills (accuracy and fluency) and three types of literacy instruction activities (coded from the video recordings). The number of students present and the teachers' work experience were controlled in the analyses.ResultsThe results indicated that, at classroom‐level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code‐focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group. In turn, higher average reading skills in classrooms were associated with more lesson time allocated to individual or small group assignments. The reading skills were not associated with meaning‐focused activities such as text‐level reading activities and class discussions with the whole group.ConclusionsIn early literacy lessons, students' reading skills were associated with teachers' implementation of different literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. In classrooms with more students having already acquired basic decoding skills, teachers provided more classroom time for independent practice and individual support, which is likely to support consolidation of students' literacy skills.
Highlights
Adapting instruction to individual students’ needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students’ reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom-level
The results indicated that, at classroom-level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code-focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group
Students’ reading skills vary greatly at the entry to primary school. Adapting both the content and amount of instructional support based on a student’s skills has been shown to be effective, but the knowledge of these processes is limited into studying adaptations at the level of the individual student or specific learning situations
Summary
Adapting instruction to individual students’ needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students’ reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom-level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers’ instructional support through instructional management are considered. Multilevel path analyses were conducted to examine the classroom-level associations between reading skills (accuracy and fluency) and three types of literacy instruction activities (coded from the video recordings). Results: The results indicated that, at classroom-level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code-focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group. The reading skills were not associated with meaning-focused activities such as text-level reading activities and class discussions with the whole group
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
