Abstract
Abstract This comment explores the identity and politics of interpretive accounting research (IAR) by reflecting upon its positioning between, and overlap with, ‘mainstream’ and ‘critical’ accounting scholarship. It draws attention to the political struggle to define and occupy a distinctive academic space by considering what self-styled IAR researchers report as their accomplishments and how the distinctive contribution of IAR might be more closely specified and developed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
