Abstract
A current experiment, along with a reanalysis of data from an earlier study by Bartling and Thompson (1977), provided results inconsistent with the Tulving-Wiseman function (Tulving & Wiseman, 1975). With type of word pair as a within-subject variable, observed probabilities of recognition conditionalized on recall were less than predicted probabilities from the Tulving-Wiseman function for noun-adjective, cue-target pairs. The reverse was true for adjective-noun pairs. Observed probabilities of recognition conditionalized on recall were generally not different from predicted probabilities for noun-noun and adjective-adjective pairs. These list-subset effects were used to support the argument that additional research on the relation between recognition and recall is needed before supporters elevate the Tulving-Wiseman function to the status of a law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
