Abstract
The present paper offers a synopsis of the different scenarios that may give rise to the application of the lis pendens principle in international commercial arbitration, focusing first on parallel proceedings before a domestic court and an arbitral tribunal, and second on parallel proceedings before different arbitral tribunals; it thereby avoids a discussion on parallel actions before arbitral tribunals and supranational bodies, which would step into the turfs of public international law. The first scenario being rather concisely addressed by the New York Convention and national arbitration statutes, this paper devotes a considerable part of the discussion to identifying solutions to the second scenario, and assessing the practicalities (or lack thereof) they might entail.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
