Liriomyza spp.

Abstract

EPPO BulletinVolume 35, Issue 2 p. 335-344 Free Access Liriomyza spp. First published: 03 October 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2005.00827.xCitations: 8 European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization PM 7/53(1) Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Specific scope This standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Liriomyza bryoniae, Liriomyza huidobrensis, Liriomyza sativae and Liriomyza trifolii. Specific approval and amendment This Standard was developed under the EU DIAGPRO Project (SMT 4-CT98-2252) by partnership of contractor laboratories and intercomparison laboratories in European countries. Approved as an EPPO Standard in 2004-09. Introduction There are 376 species currently recognized in the genus Liriomyza (David Henshaw, pers. comm., 2000), of which 136 are found naturally in Europe (Seymour, 1994). The adult flies of all these species look very similar. They are all small (1–3 mm in length) and, from above, are seen to be mostly black, with in most species a bright yellow scutellum. As a result, separating these species can be difficult. Close examination reveals small external differences that can be used to separate the species, such as the relative length of sections along particular wing veins, the presence, position and size of certain setae or the colour of the cuticle at the point where particular head setae arise. However, considerable variation in these character states is seen in the polyphagous pest species. As a consequence, for the pest species concerned, the ranges of variation of these characters often overlap, limiting their diagnostic value. Four species, Liriomyza bryoniae, Liriomyza huidobrensis, Liriomyza sativae and Liriomyza trifolii are listed in EU Plant Health Directive 2000/29 (EU, 2000). L. bryoniae is indigenous to Europe, while the other three all originated in the New World. All are polyphagous pests of ornamental and vegetable crops. Because of the different phytosanitary measures applied when the various Liriomyza spp. are detected on plant material, precise species identification is required. To identify these species, the diagnostician has not only to distinguish between them, but also to distinguish them from the background fauna of indigenous Liriomyza spp. (which are mostly not pests). This composition of this background fauna varies across Europe and no one morphological dichotomous key has been produced that will separate each of the four species both from each other and from the European fauna. This protocol presents methodologies by which the identity of these four species can be confirmed, whether the material available for examination consists of larvae or pupae (Fig. 1), or adult flies (Fig. 2). Since larvae and puparia possess few distinguishing morphological characters, isozyme analysis (Appendix I) and PCR-RFLP analysis (Appendix III) are recommended as additional methods. PCR-RFLP may also be useful to confirm morphological analysis of adults or to identify damaged specimens. A further species, L. strigata (Meigen, 1830), is a common, polyphagous species, indigenous to Europe. Because it is sometimes a minor pest itself and because it can be found in close proximity with the four listed species, the species is included in this protocol. L. cocculi (Frick, 1953) is a species from Hawaii whose close relationship to L. huidobrensis is indicated by the structure of the male genitalia (Spencer, 1990). However, it has a dark scutellum, is unlikely to be encountered in Europe or in association with imported commodities and is not discussed further here. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Application of the protocol for larvae and puparia. Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Application of the protocol for adult flies. Identity Name: Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach, 1858) Synonyms: Agromyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach, 1858); Liriomyza solani (Hering, 1927); Liriomyza citrulli (Rohdendorf, 1950) Taxonomic position: Insecta: Diptera: Agromyzidae EPPO computer code: LIRIBO Phytosanitary categorization: EU Annex designation I/B Name: Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard, 1926)2 Synonyms: Agromyza huidobrensis (Blanchard, 1926); Liriomyza cucumifoliae (Blanchard, 1938); Liriomyza langei (Frick, 1951); Liriomyza dianthi (Frick, 1958) Taxonomic position: Insecta: Diptera: Agromyzidae EPPO computer code: LIRIHU Phytosanitary categorization: EPPO A2 list no. 152, EU Annex designation II/A2 Name: Liriomyza sativae (Blanchard, 1938) Synonyms: Liriomyza pullata (Frick, 1952); Liriomyza canomarginis (Frick, 1952); Liriomyza minutiseta (Frick, 1952); Liriomyza propepusilla (Frost, 1954); Liriomyza munda (Frick, 1957); Liriomyza guytona (Freeman, 1958) Taxonomic position: Insecta: Diptera: Agromyzidae EPPO computer code: LIRISA Phytosanitary categorization: EPPO A1 list no. 152, EU Annex designation I/A1 Name: Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess, 1880) Synonyms: Liriomyza alliovora (Frick, 1955) Taxonomic position: Insecta: Diptera: Agromyzidae EPPO computer code: LIRITR Phytosanitary categorization: EPPO A2 list no. 131, EU Annex designation II/A2 Detection Damage symptoms Feeding punctures and leaf mines are usually the first and most obvious sign of the presence of Liriomyza spp. They remain intact and relatively unchanged over a period of weeks. Mine configuration is often considered a reliable guide to the identification of agromyzid species of no economic importance (as in many such cases the species are host-specific). However, with the polyphagous pest species, mine configuration is affected by the host, by the physical and physiological condition of each leaf and by the number of larvae mining the same leaf. This wider range of variation means that identification from mine patterns alone should be treated with caution. Feeding punctures Feeding punctures of Liriomyza spp. are rounded and usually about 0.2 mm in diameter. They appear as white speckles on the upper leaf surface. The appearance of the punctures does not differ between species, nor can the pattern of their distribution on the leaf be used to separate species. Leaf mines The larvae feed mostly in the upper part of the leaf, mining through the green palisade tissue. Mines are usually off-white, with trails of frass appearing as broken black strips along their length. Repeated convolutions in the same small part of the leaf will often result in discoloration of the mine with dampened black and dried brown areas appearing, usually as the result of plant-induced reactions to the leaf miner. The typical appearances of mines (Web Figs 9 and 10) of these species are: • a tightly coiled, almost blotch-like mine –L. trifolii • a looser, irregular serpentine mine –L. bryoniae and L. sativae • an irregular serpentine mine tending to be restricted by veins within segments of the leaf and undulating between upper and lower leaf surface –L. huidobrensis • a mine closely following the main vein toward (and occasionally into) the petiole –L. strigata. Larvae exit the fully developed mines in order to pupariate (usually in the soil, sometimes on the surface of the leaf). The exit hole characteristically takes the form of a semicircular slit. The mines of other species of agromyzids may look similar to those described above. Nevertheless, the feeding punctures and mines of Chromatomyia syngenesiae can usually be separated from those described above (Web Fig. 11). The feeding punctures of C. syngenesiae are larger (up to 1.0 mm in diameter) and distinctly oval in shape. The mines appear cleaner, uniformly white, with less convolutions and the frass appearing as distinctly separated black dots. As with L. huidobrensis, the mines can undulate between the upper and lower leaf surfaces. The larvae of C. syngenesiae, and of C. horticola, pupariate within the mine with the anterior spiracles usually projecting out from the lower surface of the leaf. Identification of family and genus Morphological terminology used in this protocol is based on that of McAlpine et al. (1981). Family: Agromyzidae Agromyzids are small flies whose larvae are leaf miners, stem borers or gall-makers. Formal description (of the adult) The following combination of characters (Web Fig. 3), which define the family Agromyzidae, follows Hennig (1958) (as quoted in Spencer, 1987). Vibrissae present; 1–7 frontal bristles present; costal break present at the apex of Sc; cell cup small; A1 not reaching wing margin; pregenital sclerites of male with a simple (fused) tergal complex (tergites 6–8) with only two spiracles between tergite 5 and the genital segment; and anterior part of abdominal segment 7 in female forming an oviscape. Practical diagnosis (based on the larval stages) In practice, agromyzids are recognizable because their larvae feed in the living tissue of plants (three-quarters of them are leaf miners). There are leaf miners in other Dipteran families. Typically, agromyzid larvae are cylindrical in shape, tapering anteriorly; with projections bearing the anterior and posterior spiracles, the former positioned on the dorsal surface of the prothorax, the latter backwardly directed at the rear; prominent, strongly sclerotized mouthparts, the mandibles with its longitudinal axis at oblique or right angles to the rest of the cephalopharyngeal skeleton and usually bearing two or more pairs of equally sized teeth, directed anteriorly, the ventral cornua (the posteriorly directed ‘arms’) commonly shorter than the dorsal ones. For a summary of information on the morphology and biology of the immature stages of agromyzids, with a large bibliography and illustrations of the cephalopharyngeal skeleton and posterior spiracles for a number of species, see Ferrar (1987). Genus: Liriomyza Formal description (of the adult) Small flies, 1–3 mm in length; fronto-orbital setulae reclinate; usually with a dark prescutellar area concolorous with the scutum, rarely yellow; scutellum yellow in most species, rarely dark; costa extends to vein M1; discal cell small; dm-cu crossvein present in most species; stridulating organ present in males (a ‘scraper’, a chitinized ridge on the hind-femora, and a ‘file’, a line of low chitinized scales on the connecting membrane between the abdominal tergites and sternites). Practical diagnosis The economically important species discussed in this protocol are seen from above to be mostly black with a yellow frons and a bright yellow scutellum. The legs are variably yellow. They possess the typical wing venation for the genus (Web Fig. 4). Natural species groups The Liriomyza spp. considered here separate into two distinct natural groups, based on the structure of the male genitalia, and the colour and the structure of the posterior spiracles of the larvae. However, the external characters of the adult flies useful for identification (Table 1), particularly those based on colour, do not fall neatly into these two groupings: Group 1 (L. bryoniae, L. huidobrensis, L. strigata, L. cocculi); Group 2 (L. sativae, L. trifolii). Table 1. Morphological characters of Liriomyza spp., adult Male distiphallus Vertical setae (see Web Fig. 3) Anepisternum (see Web Fig. 3) Vein Cu 1 A (see Web Fig. 4) L. bryoniae Two distal bulbs, bulb rims circular Both vertical setae on yellow ground Predominantly yellow, small black mark at front lower margin a twice length of b L. huidobrensis Two distal bulbs, meeting only at their rims Both vertical setae on black ground Yellow with variable black patch generally across the lower three-quarters a 2–2.5 times length of b L. sativae One distal bulb with a slight constriction between upper and lower halves Outer vertical seta on black ground which may just reach inner vertical seta which otherwise is on yellow Predominantly yellow, with dark area varying in size from a small bar along the lower margin to a patch along the entire lower margin, well up the front margin and narrowly up the hind margin a 3–4 times length of b L. strigata Two distal bulbs, meeting from their rims to their bases At least outer vertical seta on black ground Yellow, black patch variable and can extend across the lower half a 2–2.5 times length of b L. trifolii One distal bulb with marked constriction between lower and upper halves Both vertical setae on yellow ground Yellow, small blackish grey mark at front lower margin a 3–4 times length of b Third antennal segment Frons & orbits Femur Mesonotum Wing length L. bryoniae Small, yellow Frons bright yellow, orbits slightly paler Bright yellow with some brownish striations Black, largely shining but with distinct matt undertone 1.75–2.1 mm L. huidobrensis Slightly enlarged, usually darkened Frons yellow, generally more orange than pale lemon-yellow; upper orbits slightly darkened at least to upper ors Yellow, variably darkened with black striations Black, matt 1.7–2.25 mm L. sativae Small, yellow Frons and orbits bright yellow Bright yellow Black, shining 1.3–1.7 mm L. strigata Small, yellow Frons and orbits yellow Yellow with some brownish striations Black, shining but slightly matt 1.8–2.1 mm L. trifolii Small, yellow Frons and orbits yellow slight brownish striations Yellow, occasional Matt black with grey undertone 1.3–1.7 mm Information, except with respect to the distiphallus, compiled from Spencer (1973, 1976). Identification of the different life stages Eggs The eggs are laid into the leaf tissue. They are white and oval, about 0.25 mm in length. Neither genus nor species identification is possible. Larvae and pupae There are three larval instars, which feed as they tunnel through the leaf tissue. The newly emerged larvae are about 0.5 mm long but reach 3.0 mm when full-grown. They are typical of agromyzids in gross form (see above, and Web Fig. 12a). Pupae are oval, about 2.0 mm in length, very slightly flattened ventrally, with projecting anterior and posterior spiracles. In practice, for larvae and pupae, the two natural groups can be distinguished from each other morphologically but not the species within the groups. Species determination requires electrophoretic analysis (see Appendix I) or PCR-RFLP (Appendix III). Group 1 Larvae are cream-coloured but in the final instar additionally develop a yellow-orange patch dorsally at the anterior end, which can extend right around to the ventral surface. Each posterior spiracle consists of an ellipse with pores along the margin (Web Fig. 12b). It can be difficult to make out the number of pores, which according to Spencer (1973), are: L. bryoniae 7–12 pores; L. huidobrensis about 6–9 pores and L. strigata 10–12 pores. Puparia are variable in coloration, from yellow-orange to dark brown. In L. bryoniae and L. strigata, they are mostly, but not exclusively, at the lighter end of the colour range. Mostly the colour of L. huidobrensis puparia tends to anthracite. The form of the larval spiracles is retained in the puparium although the pores are less clearly discernible. Group 2 Larvae are translucent when newly emerged, yellow-orange later. Each posterior spiracle is tricorn-shaped with three pores, each on a distinct projection, the outer two elongate (Web Fig. 12c). Puparia are yellowish-orange, sometimes a darker golden-brown. Again the form of the larval spiracles is retained but the detail is less obvious. Adults External characters Important morphological characters are shown in Table 1. For morphological keys, descriptions of species and illustrations of the male aedeagus of a number of European species of Liriomyza (and other agromyzids), see Spencer (1972, 1976). For species descriptions and illustrations of species worldwide, including economically important species, see Spencer (1973, 1990). Identification based on distiphallic structure The distiphallus is the terminal part of the aedeagus (the intromittent organ, part of the male genitalia) (Web Fig. 14a,d; Web Fig. 18 (Plate 1)) and its complex three-dimensional structure is here of considerable diagnostic value. Indeed, the distiphallus provides a single character by which all five species can be reliably identified. In other words, all other species of Liriomyza, including those not discussed here, can be eliminated. The distiphallus is a very small, fragile structure enclosed by membranes and requires careful dissection and subsequent examination under a high power microscope. The basic structure of the distiphallus differs in the two natural species groups: in Group 1, there are two distal bulbs side by side (Web Fig. 14b), while in Group 2 there is only one distal bulb with a medial constriction dividing distinct lower and upper sections (Web Fig. 14c). Separation of the five species using the distiphallus is described in Appendix II. Brief summary descriptions of the five species are provided below. Group 1 – distiphallus with two distal bulbs L. bryoniae : bulb rims of distiphallus circular; relatively yellow, medium-size fly with both vertical setae on yellow. L. huidobrensis : bulbs of distiphallus meet only at their rims; a larger and darker fly with both vertical setae on black and the black extending forward along the upper orbits; third antennal segment usually darkened. L. strigata : bulbs of distiphallus meet along their length; medium to large, moderately dark fly with at least the outer vertical seta on black. Group 2 – distiphallus with one distal bulb L. sativae : slight medial constriction on the distiphallus bulb; smaller, moderately dark fly with at least the outer vertical seta on black; section a of wing vein Cu1A much longer relative to section b than in Group 1 species. L. trifolii : marked medial constriction on the distiphallus bulb; relatively yellow, smaller fly with both vertical setae on yellow; section a of wing vein Cu1A much longer relative to section b than in Group 1 species. Reporting and documentation Guidance on reporting and documentation is given in EPPO Standard PM7/– (in preparation). Further information Further information on this organism can be obtained from: D. W. Collins, Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ (UK) E-mail: dom.collins@csl.gov.uk. Footnotes 1 The Figures in this Standard marked ‘Web Fig.’ are published on the EPPO website http://www.eppo.org. 2 Note: it has recently been proposed that L. huidobrensis is in fact a complex of two cryptic species. This follows a study of specific sequences in mitochondrial and nuclear genomes (Scheffer, 2000; Scheffer & Lewis, 2001). The name Liriomyza langei has been applied to North American populations, and the name L. huidobrensis to Central and South American populations. All invasive populations were found to belong to L. huidobrensis as so defined. L. langei and L. huidobrensis could not be separated morphologically, but a PCR-RFLP protocol for separating them has been published (Scheffer et al., 2001). This can only distinguish between these two taxa, and L. bryoniae would produce as false a result as L. huidobrensis. The authors do not comment on other species such as L. strigata. They also note that, potentially, the primers used would also amplify parasitoid DNA and therefore recommend restricting use of the protocol to adult material. For the purposes of this Standard, the name L. huidobrensis will continue to be applied to all the specimens originating from the trans-American populations that cannot currently be separated by morphological means. 3 Liriomyza individuals are subject to attack by parasitoid wasps and the host electrophoretic band pattern may be replaced by that of the parasitoid. The replacement process is not instantaneous and a range of intermediate patterns incorporating elements from both host and parasitoid may be seen (Collins, 1996). Atypical band patterns should therefore be treated with caution. Ideally, at least 2–3 individuals should be run from a sample so as to eliminate the possibility of a single individual producing an atypical or (very rarely) a misleading band pattern. Acknowledgements This protocol was originally drafted by D. W. Collins, Central Science Laboratory, York (GB) E-mail: dom.collins@csl.gov.uk. Many of the line drawings found in this protocol are based on original versions by Paul Seymour, formerly of the Central Science Laboratory, UK. Paul Seymour also took all the photographs of Liriomyza genitalia. The PCR-RFLP protocol was developed by Linda Kox, Plant Protection Service, Wageningen (NL). Appendices Appendix I Electrophoretic identification of larvae and puparia to species The use of allozyme electrophoresis to identify the immature stages of selected Liriomyza spp. was developed by Menken & Ulenberg (1983, 1986), the methodology technologically improved by Oudman (1992) and the protocols refined by Oudman et al. (1995) and Collins (1996). The protocols given here are those of Oudman et al. (1995), Protocol A, and Collins (1996), Protocol B, and one should be selected according to the identification question being asked. A diagrammatic representation of the successive steps undertaken in this procedure is presented as Fig. 1. Protocol A uses three isoenzymes to distinguish between the four listed species, L. bryoniae, L. huidobrensis, L. sativae and L. trifolii. Protocol B separates the three species in natural group 1, L. bryoniae, L. huidobrensis and L. strigata, and explicitly both eliminates Chromatomyia horticola and C. syngenesiae and provides warning against potentially misleading results caused by the presence of the endoparasitoid Dacnusa sibirica Telenga, 193433 Liriomyza individuals are subject to attack by parasitoid wasps and the host electrophoretic band pattern may be replaced by that of the parasitoid. The replacement process is not instantaneous and a range of intermediate patterns incorporating elements from both host and parasitoid may be seen (Collins, 1996). Atypical band patterns should therefore be treated with caution. Ideally, at least 2–3 individuals should be run from a sample so as to eliminate the possibility of a single individual producing an atypical or (very rarely) a misleading band pattern. . Interpretation of the band patterns from unknown samples requires direct comparison with a known standard, usually taken from a laboratory culture of L. bryoniae. Equipment The apparatus used for sample preparation and the electrophoretic run is manufactured by Helena Laboratories (Beaumont, US). The basic components required are an electrophoretic tank (cat. no. 1283), paper wicks (cat. no. 5081) and an applicator kit (cat. no. 4093), the latter made up of the applicator itself with 12 microtips, a sample well plate and an aligning base for the gels. Electrophoresis is carried out on pre-manufactured Titan III cellulose acetate plates (catalogue no. 3024 or 3033). Sample storage Isozyme electrophoresis requires biochemically active enzymes. Samples should either still be live or stored in the freezer until removal immediately before use. Samples may be stored for several weeks within plastic microtubes at −20°C. Longer-term storage should be at −80°C. Gel preparation The cellulose acetate plates are pre-soaked for 20–30 min in 800 mL 25 mm Tris Glycine, pH 8.5 buffer solution to which NADP (70 mg L−1) and MgCl2 (70 mg L−1) have been added. Three gels are required for protocol A, two gels for protocol B. Gel/electrode buffer: 3.03 g Tris, 14.41 g glycine, make up to 1000 mL with distilled water, add NADP (70 mg L−1) and MgCl2 (70 mg L−1). Stain buffers: 1.21 g Tris, 100 mL distilled water, titrate to pH 8.0 with 1 m HCl. Sample preparation Individual larvae or puparia are homogenized in either 10 µL of NADP solution in a microtube using a moulded plastic crusher (with the homogenate then being transferred to the well of the sample plate) (Protocol A) or in 5 µL of NADP solution in situ in the well of the sample plate using a heat-sealed Pasteur pipette (Protocol B). Samples taken from the freezer should be kept below 4°C (e.g. in melting ice) until immediately before use. Electrophoresis Each of the outside chambers of the electrophoresis tank is filled with 100 mL 25 mm Tris Glycine, pH 8.5 buffer solution. Paper wicks are soaked in this solution and then attached to the inner walls of these two chambers along their length so that in each case one side drops into the solution and the other just overhangs into the next chamber. Each gel in turn is removed from the buffer solution, blotted between sheets of filter paper, in order to remove excess liquid, and placed onto the aligning base. The homogenates are then applied from the sample plate to the gel using the applicator. Three to four applications per gel may be required to ensure sufficient homogenate on the gel. The gel is then placed across the middle two chambers of the electrophoretic tank with the cellulose side down so that good contact is made between the cellulose and the wicks. Protocol A: the gels are run simultaneously for 18 min at 200 V (1 mA per gel). Protocol B: the gels are initially run simultaneously for 18 min at 200 V (1 mA per gel). Electrophoresis is then interrupted and the first plate removed (to be stained for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase). The second plate is then run for a further 20 min, still at 200 V. Staining Staining schedules essentially follow those outlined by Hebert & Beaton (1989). Staining solutions are prepared fresh from stock solutions while the electrophoresis is in progress. Note that PMS and l-amino acid oxidase are light-sensitive and should only be added to the relevant staining solutions (Table 2) immediately before they are used. The gels are removed from the electrophoresis tank and placed on a plexiglass plate. The staining solution is mixed with approximately 2 mL molten agar and gently and evenly poured over the gel. Bands are usually visible within a minute or two but, if this proves not to be the case, the staining reactions may be incubated in the dark for up to 45 min at 37°C. The staining reaction may be brought to a halt at any time by placing the agar-overlain gel plate in a 7% (v/v) solution of acetic acid. Table 2. Staining solutions of G6PDH, IDH, ME and PEP Chemical (stock solution) G6PDH IDH ME PEP Tris-HCl, 0.1 m, pH 8.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 mL NADP (2 mg mL−1) 1.5 1.5 1.5 – mL O-Dianisidine (4 mg mL−1) – – – 8.0 drops MgCl2 (20 mg mL−1) 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 drops d-glucose-6-phosphate (20 mg mL−1) 12.0 – – – drops DL-isocitric acid (100 mg mL−1) – 15.0 – – drops DL-malic acid (70 mg mL−1) – – 12.0 – drops Leu-Gly (dry) – – – 10.0 mg MTT (10 mg mL−1) 5.0 5.0 5.0 – drops PMS (10 mg mL−1) 1.0 1.0 1.0 – drops Peroxidase (10 mg mL−1) – – – 5.0 drops l-amino acid oxidase (10 mg mL−1) – – – 5.0 drops Agar (16 mg mL−1) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 mL MTT = methyl thiazolyl blue; PMS = phenazine methosulphate. Protocol A: the three gels are, respectively, stained for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), isocitrate dehyrogenase (IDH) and malic enzyme (ME). Protocol B: the first gel to be removed from the electrophoresis tank is stained for G6PDH, the second for leucine-glycine peptidase (PEP). Interpretation of band patterns Interpretation of the band patterns is achieved using the biochemical keys presented in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3. Key for separation of Liriomyza spp. by allozyme electrophoresis: Protocol A. The most common phenotype of L. bryoniae found on the gel is used as a standard: G6PDH 25, IDH 18, ME 31/38 (Fig. 5) 1 G6PDH band faster than L. bryoniae standard L. huidobrensis G6PDH the same or slower than the L. bryoniae standard 2 2 IDH band faster than the L. bryoniae standard* L. sativae IDH band same as or slower than the L. bryoniae standard 3 3 ME band slower than the L. bryoniae standard L. trifolii ME band the same as the L. bryoniae standard (heterozygote) or only one of the L. bryoniae homozygote bands present L. bryoniae * L. bryoniae also has one rare allele, which is faster than the standard. This is still marginally slower than the L. sativae band. Table 4. Key for separation of Liriomyza spp. by allozyme electrophoresis: Protocol B. See Web Figs 6–8 1 G6PDH band faster than the L. bryoniae standard L. huidobrensis G6PDH band the same or slightly slower than the L. bryoniae standard 2 2 PEP-1 band present (band within 15 mm of origin; occasionally travels towards cathode) 3 PEP-1 band displaced, absent or heavy streaking associated with it 4 3 PEP-1 band the same or slower than the L. bryoniae standard L. bryoniae PEP-1 band faster than the L. bryoniae standard (between 10 and 15 mm) L. strigata 4 PEP-1 band displaced to become a poorly resolved band located between 20 and 30 mm L. trifolii; L. sativae, C. syngenesiae, C. horticola PEP-1 band absent or heavy streaking associated Parasitism byD. sibirica Appendix II Identification