Abstract

ABSTRACT This study addresses the need to transition WWTPs from energy-intensive operations to carbon-neutral and energy-efficient systems by examining VFAs’ concentrations, which vary significantly with different types of wastewater. The analytical performance of the liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) method using two solvents – methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and dichloromethane (DCM) – followed by injection into a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) system is evaluated. The limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) for VFAs ranged from 3 to 7.41 mg/L and 0.91 to 2.25 mg/L, respectively. Precision for lower VFAs (ethanoic (C2), propanoic (C3), 2-methyl-propanoic (iC4), butanoic (C4), methyl-butanoic (iC5), and pentanoic acids (C5)) using DCM and MTBE ranged from 1.99% to 8.64% and 1.21% to 6.68%, respectively, with accuracies of 90.35% to 107.27% and 81.55% to 105.96%, respectively. For higher VFAs (iC6, C6, and C7) using DCM, precision ranged from 18.44% to 27.06%, and accuracy ranged from 70.1% to 101.4%. In contrast, MTBE failed to detect VFAs iC6, C6, and C7. These findings underscore the importance of solvent selection in VFA analysis and its implications for optimising WWTP operations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.