Abstract

In this article, I illustrate two ways in which Zionist settlers appropriated water in Mandate Palestine. The first way was through the imposition of a new kind of property regime, one that measured and defined water rights in terms of volume. This differed from customary Palestinian practice, which distributed water in time-based shares. I argue that volume-based measures made water more easily bought and sold and, by extension, more like a commodity. The second method of appropriation I detail is the granting of concessions to generate hydroelectricity to the Palestine Electric Corporation. These concessions gave the company control over three of Palestine’s major rivers, which it then turned into an object of investment for foreign shareholders. As a result, water use cannot be understood separately from electricity during the Mandate. While these two processes might appear unrelated, I argue that they were both legalized methods of exclusion that, when taken together, reveal a larger process of gradual, albeit incomplete, dispossession of water resources. While Zionist settler colonialism legitimated itself by claiming to efficiently use natural resources, such as water, in actuality, it sustained itself by imposing exclusive property rights.

Highlights

  • There is a saying in the village of Battir, located to the southwest of Jerusalem, that a week “lasts eight days, not seven.” Each of Battir’s eight families has a one-day long claim to the village’s water supply

  • I examine some of the processes by which Zionist settlers dispossessed Palestinians of their water resources over the course of the British Mandate, which spanned from the early 1920s to the creation of the State of Israel in 1948

  • For farmers who measured their share of water in hours or days, water use was embedded in complex networks of community relationships and composed the temporal rhythm of daily life (Peteet 2018; Seikaly 2019)

Read more

Summary

Cristina Violante

I illustrate two ways in which Zionist settlers appropriated water in Mandate Palestine. The first way was through the imposition of a new kind of property regime, one that measured and defined water rights in terms of volume. This differed from customary Palestinian practice, which distributed water in time-based shares. The second method of appropriation I detail is the granting of concessions to generate hydroelectricity to the Palestine Electric Corporation. Water use cannot be understood separately from electricity during the Mandate While these two processes might appear unrelated, I argue that they were both legalized methods of exclusion that, when taken together, reveal a larger process of gradual, albeit incomplete, dispossession of water resources. While Zionist settler colonialism legitimated itself by claiming to efficiently use natural resources, such as water, in actuality, it sustained itself by imposing exclusive property rights

INTRODUCTION
Year C
WATER INVESTMENT AND SPECULATION
GRANTING THE CONCESSIONS
CORPORATE VOTING RIGHTS
FAILURE TO REGULATE
SABOTAGE AT A DISTANCE
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call