Abstract
Using a panel of South African banks covering the period from 2005 t o 2015, we further develop, validate and test the liability mismatch index (LMI) developed by Bai, Krishnamurthy and Weymuller (2018). Deviating from their approach, we develop measures of liquidity that integrate both market liquidity and funding liquidity. Two liquidity measures developed are the bank liquidity mismatch index (BLMI) and the aggregate liquidity mismatch index (ALMI) whose performances are compared and contrasted with the Basel III liquidity measures and traditional liquidity measures. Overall, the two constructed liquidity indices perform better than other liquidity measures. Unlike the LMI, the BLMI and ALMI can be used to evaluate the liquidity of a given bank under liquidity stress events. Our empirical results, though not significant, also show that banks increase their liquidity buffers during times of turmoil as both BLMI and ALMI improved during the period 2007-2009.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
