Abstract
We demonstrate that liquid metals can be used as cathodes in light emitting diodes (pLEDs). The main difference between the use of liquid cathodes and evaporated cathodes is the sharpness of the metal–polymer interface. Liquid metal cathodes result in significantly sharper metal–organic interfaces than vapor deposited cathodes, due to the high surface energy of the metals. The sharper interface in pLEDs with liquid metal cathodes is observed by neutral impact collision ion scattering spectroscopy and low energy ion scattering spectroscopy measurements. The influence of interface sharpness on device performance was studied by comparing current–voltage-light characteristics of devices with OC1C10 paraphenylenevinylene (PPV) as electroluminescent polymer and indium tin oxide (ITO) as hole injection electrode, and different cathodes. Comparison of devices using a liquid Ga cathode and an evaporated Al cathode showed that light emission for the liquid Ga cathode is two orders of magnitude larger than for the evaporated Al cathode, and that the external light efficiency is increased by an order of magnitude. Since the work function of Ga and Al is nearly the same, the poor performance for evaporated Al LEDs is attributed to the formation of an interfacial layer where Al has diffused into, and reacted with, the PPV. This interfacial layer has poor electrical conduction compared to pure PPV, and contains quenching sites which reduce light emission. Low work function liquid metal cathodes were studied by using liquid Ca and Ba amalgams. The improved performance of liquid amalgam pLEDs is attributed to the different structure of the metal–polymer interface. The enormous increase in light and current through the amalgam devices compared to those using pure Hg demonstrate that less than 1 ML of a metal with a low work function at the polymer-cathode interface can have a dramatic effect on the performance of the devices. Devices with a liquid Ca amalgam cathode showed an increase of the current (by 50%) and brightness (80%) compared to devices with an evaporated Ca cathode, which is ascribed to reduced diffusion of Ca into the emissive PPV layer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.