Abstract

The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence provides an exceptional opportunity to investigate the effects of varying degrees of liquefaction on the built environment. Significant ground settlements and building damage in the Central Business District (CBD) were observed for the Christchurch earthquake. The results of CPTs and soil index tests from exploratory borings performed in the CBD are combined with cyclic triaxial (CTX) test results to characterize the soil deposits at several buildings sites. Conventional one-dimensional liquefaction-induced ground settlement procedures do not capture shear-induced deformation mechanisms and the effects of ground loss due to sediment ejecta. Improved procedures are required. Nonlinear effective stress analyses using robust soil constitutive models calibrated through CTX tests provide a means for developing these procedures. The CTX tests estimate generally consistent cyclic resistances as the CPT-based methods for medium dense sands and silty sands; however, the CTX tests provide useful insights regarding pore water pressure response and strain development. Correlations and CTX tests performed on loose clean sands indicate that these specimens were disturbed by the sampling process. Interim findings from this ongoing study are presented, and preliminary recommendations for evaluating the seismic performance of buildings with shallow foundations at sites with liquefiable soils are provided.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.