Abstract

Patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at a very high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels have been shown to be a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke. More recently elevated lipoprotein(a) levels have also been demonstrated to be associated with prevalent and incident PAD, and even may be a stronger risk factor for PAD compared with CAD. Lipoprotein apheresis is currently the only efficient way to lower lipoprotein(a) levels. Lipoprotein(a) apheresis has been shown to reduce major coronary events in patients with CAD. There is increasing evidence that lipoprotein(a) apheresis also reduces the rate of major adverse limb events such as peripheral revascularizations and amputations in PAD patients, and improves symptoms of PAD such as pain on exertion. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the clinical role of lipoprotein(a) for PAD and the disease-specific effect of lipoprotein(a) apheresis, and suggests indications for screening for and treating of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with PAD.

Highlights

  • Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) are different manifestations of atherosclerotic vascular disease

  • Lipoprotein apheresis has been shown to reduce the rate of cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease associated with high lipoprotein(a) levels [20,21,22,23]

  • Randomized controlled trials are missing and won’t be possible to perform due to ethical reasons within the near future longitudinal observational studies strongly suggest that the reduction of lipoprotein(a) levels by lipoprotein apheresis significantly and clinical relevantly reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events [20,21,22,23, 25]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) are different manifestations of atherosclerotic vascular disease. The 2.5-year event rate of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization was significantly higher in patients with symptomatic PAD (16.8%) compared with patients without PAD (12.1%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.57).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call