Abstract
BackgroundThe present studies were conducted to characterize lipemic interference across three FDA-cleared ceruloplasmin (CERU) assays and to evaluate procedures designed to remove lipemic interference. MethodsCERU assays on the Abbott ARCHITECT ci8200, Beckman AU5800, and Roche cobas Integra 400 Plus were evaluated. Precision, linearity with dilution, lipemic interference, and three methods for removing lipemia were assessed on each platform: ultracentrifugation (UC), lipemia-clearing reagent LipoClear (LC), and 1:5 dilution (DIL). Lipemia-index (L-index) thresholds were established using endogenously lipemic specimens and sera spiked with human-derived triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. ResultsThe ci8200 showed greater susceptibility to endogenous lipemic interference than would be expected based on vendor-derived limits established with Intralipid. Endogenous lipemia causes a negative interference on the ci8200 and a positive interference on the Integra. UC was generally the most reliable method of removing lipemic interference without impacting baseline CERU results. ConclusionsCERU assays on different platforms have varying susceptibility to lipemic interference. L-index thresholds derived using Intralipid may not accurately represent interference caused by endogenous lipemia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
