Abstract
Abstract Our purpose of this paper is to consider Liouville property for the fractional Lane-Emden equation ( − Δ ) α u = u p i n Ω , u = 0 i n R N ∖ Ω , $$\begin{array}{} \displaystyle (-{\it\Delta})^\alpha u = u^p\quad {\rm in}\quad {\it\Omega},\qquad u = 0\quad {\rm in}\quad \mathbb{R}^N\setminus {\it\Omega}, \end{array}$$ where α ∈ (0, 1), N ≥ 1, p > 0 and Ω ⊂ ℝ N–1 × [0, +∞) is an unbounded domain satisfying that Ωt := {x′ ∈ ℝ N–1 : (x′, t) ∈ Ω} with t ≥ 0 has increasing monotonicity, that is, Ωt ⊂ Ω t′ for t′ ≥ t. The shape of Ω ∞ := lim t→∞ Ωt in ℝ N–1 plays an important role to obtain the nonexistence of positive solutions for the fractional Lane-Emden equation.
Highlights
In this paper, we consider Liouville property for the fractional Lane-Emden equation Ω, (1.1)where α ∈ (, ), p >, Ω is an unbounded domain in RN with N ≥, and (−∆)α with α ∈ (, ) is the fractional Laplacian de ned in the principle value sense, (−∆)α u(x) = cN,α lim ε→ +u(x) − u(x + |z|N+ α z) d z, RN \Bε( )here Bε( ) is the ball with radius ε centered at the origin and cN,α > is the normalized constant
Where α ∈ (, ), p >, Ω is an unbounded domain in RN with N ≥, and (−∆)α with α ∈ (, ) is the fractional Laplacian de ned in the principle value sense, (−∆)α u(x) cN,α lim ε→ +
The Liouville theorem for Lane-Emden equation has attracted a lot of attentions by many mathematician by the application in the derivation of uniform bound via blowing-up analysis
Summary
We consider Liouville property for the fractional Lane-Emden equation. As far as we know, the nonexistence of elliptic equation depends on the shape of limit domain at in nity in some direction. In [15] it develops the method of moving plane in fractional setting to obtain the classi cation of critical elliptic equations in an integral form and it is used to obtain nonexistence of bounded solutions for semilinear elliptic equations in half space [12, 13, 16] subject to various boundary type conditions. It is worth noting that star-shaped domain with respect to in nity is involved in obtaining the nonexistence of fractional Lane-Emden equation in [14] and it is an important notation in our derivation of nonexistence to (1.1).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
