Links between acculturation and level and change in cognition among middle‐aged and older Hispanics/Latinos: Findings from the HCHS/SOL and SOL‐INCA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHispanics/Latinos in the United States vary widely in their levels of acculturation (adoption of Anglo‐American culture) which may have implications for cognitive functioning in older age. We aimed to characterize the relationships of acculturation with cognition and cognitive change among diverse U.S. Hispanics/Latinos.MethodSelected Hispanics/Latinos (unweighted n=5,901; ages 50+ years) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) were enrolled in the Study of Latinos ‐ Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging (SOL‐INCA) ancillary study. Three measures of acculturation were collected at baseline (Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH) – Social and Language subscales (Marin et al., 1987) and MESA Acculturation score (Kandula et al., 2008). On all measures higher scores reflect greater acculturation. Cognition was measured at two time‐points, on average, 7‐years apart. Global cognition based on a composite measure from learning and memory, executive functioning, and processing speed tests at the second testing was the main outcome of interest in addition to change in global scores. Survey linear regressions were used to separately model the associations between acculturation measures (quartiles) and cognitive outcomes (z‐scores), controlling for baseline age, sex, education, Hispanic/Latino background, field center, income, marital status, and insurance status.ResultAverage age of the target population was 63.3 ± 8.3(SD) years, 55% were female, 39% reported less than high school education, and 43% were currently uninsured. Adjusting for covariates, the least acculturated (lowest quartile) according to the SASH had lower global cognition compared to all other groups (all p‐values<0.01; Social subscale: b=0.10; SE=0.03, b=0.15; SE=0.03, and b=0.13; SE=0.03, for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles respectively; Language subscale: b=0.15; SE=0.03, b=0.12; SE=0.03, and b=0.23; SE=0.03). Individuals with the lowest MESA acculturation quartile had lower global cognition relative to those with scores in the highest quartile only (b=0.13; SE=0.04; p<0.01). None of the acculturation indices were associated with global cognitive change. Associations with domain specific cognitive outcomes were largely similar in pattern.ConclusionAcculturation may be indicative of baseline differences in cognition rather than risk for cognitive change. Alternatively, acculturation‐based distinctions in cognition may be related to differences in familiarity with testing environments or approaches to cognitive tasks.