Abstract

In this note, I review the history of CGE-Microsimulation modeling, and the main methodological issues involved.

Highlights

  • Simulation models are tools which are designed to answer “what if” questions about different policy reform options

  • Simulation models provide a powerful tool for the ex-ante evaluation of policy reform proposals

  • Combining MS and macro models enables the utilization of the complementary advantages of both types and provides a fruitful avenue for future work

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Simulation models are tools which are designed to answer “what if” questions about different policy reform options. Simulation models can provide information for an ex-ante analysis of different reform proposals. Policy simulations can be interpreted as quasi-experiments which allow the economist to ex-ante analyze a reform proposal before its implementation in real life controlling for behavioral responses of different agents in the economy. MS models usually consider only the household side of the economy, which allows for more heterogeneity and a much more detailed mapping of the complex tax benefit system. Combining these two model types enables the utilization of the complementary advantages. The aim of this note is to discuss possibilities (and problems) of linking MS and CGE models.

LINKING CGE AND MS MODELS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.