Abstract

Student engagement and learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields in primary and secondary schools is increasingly being emphasized as the importance of STEM skills for future careers is realized. Localized learning has been identified as a group of pedagogical approaches that may enhance learning in STEM by making the relevance of STEM clear to students and providing stronger connections to students’ lives and contexts. This paper reports on a scoping review that was conducted to identify the benefits and limitations of localized learning in primary and secondary school STEM disciplines. A secondary aim of the review was to identify strategies that increase the effectiveness of localized learning these disciplines. Following literature searches of four databases, 1923 articles were identified. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Potential benefits of localized learning included increases in enjoyment of STEM, improvements in learning, more positive STEM career aspirations, and development of transferable skills. The main challenges of these pedagogical approaches were time restrictions and lack of community involvement. Strategies for enhancing the impact of localized pedagogy included professional development for teachers (in STEM content knowledge, integration of localized pedagogy, and capacity to address socio-scientific issues), integration of technology, whole-school implementation of the pedagogical approach, and integration of the wider community into STEM education. These findings provide support for localized learning as an effective pedagogical approach to enhance STEM learning in schools, while emphasizing the critical roles of teachers and communities in supporting students to realize the relevance of STEM in their lives.

Highlights

  • Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields are viewed as vital contributors to economic growth and innovation (Freeman et al, 2019)

  • Articles were related to STEM with some focusing on mathematics (Althauser and Harter, 2016; Walkington and Bernacki, 2019), science

  • Given the importance of STEM knowledge and skills in our increasingly complex, scientific, technological and data-based society, it is imperative that we find ways to better engage a broader range of students in STEM disciplines in school

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields are viewed as vital contributors to economic growth and innovation (Freeman et al, 2019). While shortages in STEM fields are not ubiquitous, areas such as information and communications technology, physics, engineering, and advanced mathematics are commonly identified as areas of need. Such shortages are thought to partially stem from a “leaky pipeline” in STEM education, whereby students opt out of STEM subjects at varying points in their secondary and tertiary education (Blickenstaff, 2005; Watt et al, 2012). Research suggests that student engagement in mathematics and science education changes during the course of formal schooling, with decreases in engagement commonly reported in the early years of secondary school (Plenty and Heubeck, 2013; Potvin et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call