Abstract

Many organizations find themselves at the "front end of innovation", that is, they know they need to do something, but they are not quite sure what to do. Through our research, we have learned much more about the practice and implementation of innovation. For example, we have discovered that innovation is most successful if there is leadership support for a culture of innovation combined with systematic approaches to embed and reinforce innovative behaviours. This article outlines a case study of an organization in the financial services industry who began their innovation journey a number of years ago, and reports on the progress of a sustained and deliberate approach. This research highlights the relationship between an innovation cultural assessment model and its utilization as a framework to manage the implementation of activities to support the development of an innovation approach in a context specific scenario. A case study methodology was adopted that utilized an innovation culture model as a measurement tool. By actively observing the organization, including two cultural assessments over a 4-year period, the findings indicate that an innovation assessment model is useful as an approach to advance the innovation agenda in the organization. In this sense, the research findings are of interest to academics looking to conceptualize a broader implementation framework that is closely associated to the innovation measure associated with the organization. As well, practitioners looking to advance their innovation platforms will find the framework useful as they plan initiatives aimed at advancing their innovation agendas.

Highlights

  • Innovation is believed to be a key differentiator and a necessity in achieving competitive advantage (Amit and Schoemaker, 1993; Prahalad and Hamel, 1990)

  • There has been a significant interest in innovation implementation, with respect to innovation culture and its effect on strategy and financial performance (Naranjo Valencia et al, 2010; Aas and Pedersen, 2011; Christensen and Raynor, 2003; Govindarajan and Trimble, 2005; Hamel, 2002; Hammer, 2004; Senge and Carstedt, 2001)

  • Over the period of 4 years, through systematic management of an innovation agenda, FinanCo increased their aggregate score by 17%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Innovation is believed to be a key differentiator and a necessity in achieving competitive advantage (Amit and Schoemaker, 1993; Prahalad and Hamel, 1990). Many efforts to develop an innovation approach are either piecemeal, under resourced, or run off ‘the side of the desk.’. This leads to a lack of sustained effort, and often, frustration and failure. Specific aspects of innovation in the financial services industry have been researched, such as regulation (Nekrep, 2013), competition (Bos et al, 2013; Aghion and Griffith, 2005), implementation models (Bukowitz, 2013), leadership (Johne and Harborne, 2003; Harborne and Johne, 2002) and service and product innovation (Vermeulen and Dankbaar, 2002; Ozdemir and Trott, 2009)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call