Abstract

Predicting the onset, style and duration of explosive volcanic eruptions remains a great challenge. While the fundamental underlying processes are thought to be known, a clear correlation between eruptive features observable above Earth’s surface and conditions and properties in the immediate subsurface is far from complete. Furthermore, the highly dynamic nature and inaccessibility of explosive events means that progress in the field investigation of such events remains slow. Scaled experimental investigations represent an opportunity to study individual volcanic processes separately and, despite their highly dynamic nature, to quantify them systematically. Here, impulsively generated vertical gas-particle jets were generated using rapid decompression shock-tube experiments. The angular deviation from the vertical, defined as the “spreading angle”, has been quantified for gas and particles on both sides of the jets at different time steps using high-speed video analysis. The experimental variables investigated are 1) vent geometry, 2) tube length, 3) particle load, 4) particle size, and 5) temperature. Immediately prior to the first above-vent observations, gas expansion accommodates the initial gas overpressure. All experimental jets inevitably start with a particle-free gas phase (gas-only), which is typically clearly visible due to expansion-induced cooling and condensation. We record that the gas spreading angle is directly influenced by 1) vent geometry and 2) the duration of the initial gas-only phase. After some delay, whose length depends on the experimental conditions, the jet incorporates particles becoming a gas-particle jet. Below we quantify how our experimental conditions affect the temporal evolution of these two phases (gas-only and gas-particle) of each jet. As expected, the gas spreading angle is always at least as large as the particle spreading angle. The latter is positively correlated with particle load and negatively correlated with particle size. Such empirical experimentally derived relationships between the observable features of the gas-particle jets and known initial conditions can serve as input for the parameterisation of equivalent observations at active volcanoes, alleviating the circumstances where an a priori knowledge of magma textures and ascent rate, temperature and gas overpressure and/or the geometry of the shallow plumbing system is typically chronically lacking. The generation of experimental parameterisations raises the possibility that detailed field investigations on gas-particle jets at frequently erupting volcanoes might be used for elucidating subsurface parameters and their temporal variability, with all the implications that may have for better defining hazard assessment.

Highlights

  • During short-lived, transient stages of Strombolian, Vulcanian and Plinian events at explosive volcanic centres, Editorial responsibility: M.R

  • We extend the analysis of Cigala et al (2017) experiments to constrain the dynamic evolution of the gas and particle spreading angle

  • We focus on understanding how initial conditions, such as vent geometry or particle load, affect the lateral spreading of gas and particles impulsively ejected into the atmosphere after a rapid decompression event

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During short-lived, transient stages of Strombolian, Vulcanian and (in part) Plinian events at explosive volcanic centres, Editorial responsibility: M.R. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Theresienstr 41, 80333 Munich, Germany two-phase mixtures (solid pyroclasts and lithics, plus gas) are impulsively ejected in the atmosphere at initial velocities that can range from tens to hundreds of m/s. These jets can be initially subsonic (Mach number M < 1) or supersonic (M > 1) (Kieffer and Sturtevant 1984; Koyaguchi et al 2010; Carcano et al 2014). There is a growing number of studies that investigate the geometry and morphology of volcanic vents (e.g. Turner et al 2017; Salvatore et al 2018; Schmid et al 2020) and their evolution during activity from the experimental point of view (Solovitz et al 2014; McNeal et al 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call