Abstract

Annual cycles of animals consist of distinct life history phases linked in a unified sequence, and processes taking place in one season can influence an individual’s performance in subsequent seasons via carry-over effects. Here, using a long-distance migratory bird, the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis, we link events throughout the annual cycle by integrating breeding data, individual-based tracking, and stable-carbon isotopes to unravel the connections between different annual phases. To disentangle true carry-over effects from an individuals’ intrinsic quality, we experimentally manipulated the brood size of geolocator-tracked males prior to tracking. We did not find unambiguous differences in annual schedules between individuals of reduced and increased broods; however, in the following spring, the latter crossed the Sahara and arrived at the breeding grounds earlier. Individuals with higher absolute parental investment delayed their autumn migration, had shorter non-breeding residency period but advanced spring migration compared to individuals with lower breeding effort. Neither the local non-breeding conditions (as inferred from δ13C values) nor the previous breeding effort was linked to the timing of the following breeding period. Furthermore, while on migration, collared flycatchers showed a pronounced “domino effect” but it did not carry over across different migration seasons. Thus, the non-breeding period buffered further accumulation of carry-over effects from the previous breeding season and autumn migration. Our results demonstrate tight links between spatially and temporally distinct phases of the annual cycles of migrants which can have significant implications for population dynamics. Timing is everything! This holds true also for migratory animals which must time their annual movements, breeding and non-breeding seasons according to the environment they live in. However, perfect timing of a particular event can be hampered by past events. We studied connections between spatially and temporarily distinct annual phases in collared flycatchers, a small bodied bird which twice a year migrates between Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. We found tight links between individual’s parental investment and timing of autumn migration, but not spring migration. Similarly, the timing of autumn migration did not translate to influence the timing of spring migration. Thus, our results demonstrate that the non-breeding period may serve as a buffer to overcome high energy expenditure during the previous breeding season and prevent further accumulation of carry-over effects in migratory birds.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call