Abstract

All short and long versions of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism can be used interchangeably after appropriate scale transformations.

Highlights

  • In physics education research (PER), concept inventories (CIs) are commonly used for assessing students’ learning throughout instruction [1]

  • DS1 was collected from students who enrolled in an introductory electricity and magnetism class during spring semester, while DS2 was collected from students who enrolled

  • Motived by the algorithm to develop and validate equivalent and short CIs recently proposed by Xiao et al [5], this study developed and validated two half-length versions of Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA) (HBEMAs) under an item response theory (IRT) framework

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In physics education research (PER), concept inventories (CIs) are commonly used for assessing students’ learning throughout instruction [1]. The Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA) are both designed to assess student understanding of introductory electricity and magnetism [2,3]. The extended algorithm was used to link and compare students’ performances on CSEM and BEMA, which are two different CIs targeting similar content

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.