Abstract

The complexity of eye-movement control during reading allows measurement of many dependent variables, the most prominent ones being fixation durations and their locations in words. In current practice, either variable may serve as dependent variable or covariate for the other in linear mixed models (LMMs) featuring also psycholinguistic covariates of word recognition and sentence comprehension. Rather than analyzing fixation location and duration with separate LMMs, we propose linking the two according to their sequential dependency. Specifically, we include predicted fixation location (estimated in the first LMM from psycholinguistic covariates) and its associated residual fixation location as covariates in the second, fixation-duration LMM. This linked LMM affords a distinction between direct and indirect effects (mediated through fixation location) of psycholinguistic covariates on fixation durations. Results confirm the robustness of distributed processing in the perceptual span. They also offer a resolution of the paradox of the inverted optimal viewing position (IOVP) effect (i.e., longer fixation durations in the center than at the beginning and end of words) although the opposite (i.e., an OVP effect) is predicted from default assumptions of psycholinguistic processing efficiency: The IOVP effect in fixation durations is due to the residual fixation-location covariate, presumably driven primarily by saccadic error, and the OVP effect (at least the left part of it) is uncovered with the predicted fixation-location covariate, capturing the indirect effects of psycholinguistic covariates. We expect that linked LMMs will be useful for the analysis of other dynamically related multiple outcomes, a conundrum of most psychonomic research.

Highlights

  • In research on complex behavior we often have to choose one of several, possibly plausible outcomes as the dependent variable for our analyses

  • We propose a joint analysis of fixation locations and fixation durations in natural reading, accounting for a large number of effects related to psycholinguistic word properties and a directed effect of fixation location on the subsequent fixation duration at this location

  • First we decomposed observed fixation locations into predicted and residual fixation locations estimated in a traditional linear mixed models (LMMs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In research on complex behavior we often have to choose one of several, possibly plausible outcomes as the dependent variable for our analyses. Often these outcomes occur in a predetermined sequence. Fixation location and fixation duration are two outcomes that have greatly contributed to our understanding of oculomotor and psycholinguistic processes during natural reading. They are dynamically related with each other. Fixation location (implied in saccade amplitude) was modeled as a function of word properties and fixation duration (Wei, Li, & Pollatsek, 2013). Rather given the validity of both variables as indicators of cognitive processing efficiency, the most common scenario is to report two separate analyses or only one of them

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call