Abstract
The complexity of linguistic distribution assessments increases the difficulty for the decision makers dealing with them. Recently, stochastic dominance has been varied to be a useful tool to compare two stochastic variables. Inspired by this, in this paper we dedicate to utilizing the stochastic dominance to compare the linguistic distribution assessments and further discuss the consensus reaching issue in GDM with linguistic distribution assessments. First, we introduce three types of individuals’ semantic sensitivity. Based on this, we define the linguistic stochastic dominances respectively under different semantic sensitivity contexts, and then provide several desirable properties. Then, we design a consensus reaching resolution framework based on linguistic stochastic dominance (CRRF-LSD). Finally, a case study is provided to show the application value of the CRRF-LSD, and two comparison analyses are further conducted to show the advantages of the linguistic stochastic dominance and the CRRF-LSD. The comparison results show that the proposed linguistic stochastic dominances method has clear advantages over several classical existing methods in comparing two linguistic distribution assessments. Meanwhile, the comparison results show that only the CRRF-LSD method takes the PIS and semantic sensitivity into account, which is helpful to determine more accurate individual ranking results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.