Abstract
The past decade of national security interventions designed to counter or offer alternatives to extremist narratives have had questionable efficacy. Too frequently, interventions have been overly concerned with ‘message dominance’, focusing on ‘what’ people think, at the expense of ‘how’ people think. Intervention strategies have fundamentally ignored the role of cognitive processing in extremist decision making. This is in spite of an increasing body of evidence which demonstrates that low cognitive complexity (black and white thinking) is a recurrent contributing factor to extremist decision making. In this article, Joshua Stewart introduces Integrative Complexity (IC), a psychological measure of cognitive complexity. Through a hypothetical futures scenario, he explores the wider potential of IC in meeting national security objectives and poses that even the most obdurate, black and white thinking can be leveraged towards positive behaviours.◼
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
