Abstract
Introduction. The paper continues a series of publications on linguistics of relations (hereinafter R–linguistics) and is devoted to questions of the formation of a language from a linguistic model of the world. Moreover, the language is considered in its most general form, without taking into account the grammatical component. This allows you to focus on the general problems of language formation. Namely, this allows us to show why language adequately reflects the model of the world and what are the features of the transition from model to language. This new approach to language is relevant in connection with the formation of an understanding of the common core in all natural languages, as well as in connection with the needs for the formation of artificial intelligence subsystems of interaction with humans.Methodology and sources. Research methods consist in the formulation and proof of theorems about language spaces and their properties. The materials of the paper and the given proofs are based on the previously stated ideas about linguistic spaces and their decompositions into signs.Results and discussion. The paper shows how, in the most general form, the formation of language structures takes place. Namely, why does language adequately reflect the linguistic model, and what is the difference between linguistic and language spaces? The concepts of an open and closed form of the language are formulated, as well as the law of form. Examples of open and closed forms of the language are shown. It is shown that the formation of the language allows you to compensate for the lack of real signs in the surrounding world while maintaining the prognostic properties of the model.Conclusion. Any natural language is a reflection of the human world model. Moreover, all natural languages are similar in terms of the principles of forming the core of the language (language space). Language spaces standardize the models of the world by equalizing real and fictional signs of categories. In addition, the transition to language simplifies some of the problems of pattern recognition and opens the way to the logic of natural language.
Highlights
The paper continues a series of publications on linguistics of relations and is devoted to questions of the formation of a language from a linguistic model of the world
The second changing part is usually called grammar. This is a set of solutions that allow you to invest in a sequence of symbols elements of linguistic models so that on the receiving side of this sequence it can be decompressed and restore the model
One day one consciousness, based on theorem 5 [1], was looking for a sign that is included in the only irreducible representation of some linguistic space
Summary
Language is a means of exporting / importing data in a linguistic model of the world from one person to another. From the point of view of R-linguistics, it is a particular problem solved by each group of native speakers in their own way This does not mean that grammar is an unimportant secondary field. The nature of the transferred structures will certainly determine the data set and their relationships to be transferred This is what R-linguistics is interested in. The task of “pulling’’ a spreadsheet into a temporal sequence of the communication channel can be solved in thousands of different ways, which determine the specific “grammar’’ of the model export/import. This is a private task solved by each group of native speakers in their own way. On the basis of this, the mathematical foundations of language formation and the difference between language spaces and linguistic ones are formulated
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
