Abstract

BackgroundPopulational linkage disequilibrium and within-family linkage are commonly used for QTL mapping and marker assisted selection. The combination of both results in more robust and accurate locations of the QTL, but models proposed so far have been either single marker, complex in practice or well fit to a particular family structure.ResultsWe herein present linear model theory to come up with additive effects of the QTL alleles in any member of a general pedigree, conditional to observed markers and pedigree, accounting for possible linkage disequilibrium among QTLs and markers. The model is based on association analysis in the founders; further, the additive effect of the QTLs transmitted to the descendants is a weighted (by the probabilities of transmission) average of the substitution effects of founders' haplotypes. The model allows for non-complete linkage disequilibrium QTL-markers in the founders. Two submodels are presented: a simple and easy to implement Haley-Knott type regression for half-sib families, and a general mixed (variance component) model for general pedigrees. The model can use information from all markers. The performance of the regression method is compared by simulation with a more complex IBD method by Meuwissen and Goddard. Numerical examples are provided.ConclusionThe linear model theory provides a useful framework for QTL mapping with dense marker maps. Results show similar accuracies but a bias of the IBD method towards the center of the region. Computations for the linear regression model are extremely simple, in contrast with IBD methods. Extensions of the model to genomic selection and multi-QTL mapping are straightforward.

Highlights

  • Populational linkage disequilibrium and within-family linkage are commonly used for QTL mapping and marker assisted selection

  • The linear model theory provides a useful framework for QTL mapping with dense marker maps

  • We compared the performances of five different methods: (1) Linkage analysis (LA): Haley-Knott linkage analysis [14], (2) LDLA: the regression LDLA method in this work, (3) LD decay: LDLA regression by equation (14), that is, ignoring the v* terms, (4) two-marker: regression on twomarker haplotypes, and (5) an IBD method [3,34], which computes IBD among founders based on all markers (Lee, pers. comm.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Populational linkage disequilibrium and within-family linkage are commonly used for QTL mapping and marker assisted selection. The joint use of LD and LA ( called LDLA) permits to map QTL more accurately than LA while retaining its robustness to spurious associations, and this technique has been applied in human [1], plant [2], and livestock [3] populations. This is achieved by explicitely modelling relatedness not accounted for in association analysis [2]. The joint use of LD and LA (page number not for citation purposes)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call