Abstract

Dental impression is an important step in the preparation of prostheses since it provides the reproduction of anatomic and surface details of teeth and adjacent structures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the linear dimensional alterations in gypsum dies obtained with different elastomeric materials, using a resin coping impression technique with individual shells. A master cast made of stainless steel with fixed prosthesis characteristics with two prepared abutment teeth was used to obtain the impressions. References points (A, B, C, D, E and F) were recorded on the occlusal and buccal surfaces of abutments to register the distances. The impressions were obtained using the following materials: polyether, mercaptan-polysulfide, addition silicone, and condensation silicone. The transfer impressions were made with custom trays and an irreversible hydrocolloid material and were poured with type IV gypsum. The distances between identified points in gypsum dies were measured using an optical microscope and the results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and Tukey's test. The mean of the distances were registered as follows: addition silicone (AB = 13.6 µm, CD=15.0 µm, EF = 14.6 µm, GH=15.2 µm), mercaptan-polysulfide (AB = 36.0 µm, CD = 36.0 µm, EF = 39.6 µm, GH = 40.6 µm), polyether (AB = 35.2 µm, CD = 35.6 µm, EF = 39.4 µm, GH = 41.4 µm) and condensation silicone (AB = 69.2 µm, CD = 71.0 µm, EF = 80.6 µm, GH = 81.2 µm). All of the measurements found in gypsum dies were compared to those of a master cast. The results demonstrated that the addition silicone provides the best stability of the compounds tested, followed by polyether, polysulfide and condensation silicone. No statistical differences were obtained between polyether and mercaptan-polysulfide materials.

Highlights

  • Successful dental prosthesis is dependent upon the dimensional precision of impression materials and techniques

  • One master cast was made with stainless steel, simulating two posterior abutment teeth prepared to receive a fixed prosthesis intercalated between two bridges

  • This study accepted the hypothesis that there was significant difference on the linear dimensional alterations in gypsum dies obtained with different elastomeric materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Successful dental prosthesis is dependent upon the dimensional precision of impression materials and techniques. The cervical limits of abutment teeth, especially when they are located in subgingival regions, can be unsatisfactory because of the challenges involved in obtaining accurate impressions. This is because the impression materials are not able to keep away gingival tissues, methods are needed to handle such tissues to better reproduce structural details in these regions.[1,2,3] Many me-. Many clinicians employ the individual shell technique with mechanical gingival retraction that was initially described by Cannistraci.[6] Livaditis[7] favoured the technique of orienting the impression material distribution to mould the gingival sulcus without additional procedures such as retractor wires or chemical substances. Even with mechanical gingival retraction, the tissue trauma or gingival bleeding is minimal

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call