Abstract

Whereas the influence on the elevation of visually perceived eye level (VPEL) by two bilaterally symmetric, long (64°-long), pitched-from-vertical lines in total darkness is only a little more than the average of the VPELs of the two lines measured separately [Matin & Li (1999). Vision Research, 39, 307–329], in the present experiments with 49 2-line combinations of seven orientations (−30° to +30° pitch), the VPEL for two short (12°-long) lines equals the additive sum of the separate influences of the two lines. With one line at a fixed orientation, the slope of the VPEL-versus-pitch function with the second line variable equals the slope of the function when viewing one line alone, but is shifted from the 1-line-alone function by the magnitude of the VPEL of the fixed line. Both the near-averaging and the additivity are summarized by V( θ l, θ r)= k 1+ k 2 [ V( θ l)+ V( θ r)], where V( θ l) and V( θ r) are the 1-line VPELs for the pitches of the left and right lines, and V(θ l, θ r) is the 2-line VPEL; the slope constant k 2 equals 0.5 for averaging, and 1.00 for simple additivity of the separate visual influences. Measured values are k 2=0.99 and k 2=0.61 for short and long lines, respectively. The shift of slope constant is determined by line length and not orientation: parallel and nonparallel lines follow the same rules of combination for short lines as they do for long lines. As for long lines, the short-line results are clear in showing that the visual influence on VPEL is controlled by an opponent-process mechanism. Although ‘saturation-near-an-asymptote’ along with opponency are required components of the interpretation for the basis of the combination of lines of different orientations and different lengths, they are not by themselves sufficient: All results conform to a neurophysiologically-based model [Matin and Li (1997b). Society for Neuroscience, 23, 175; Matin & Li, under review] that parallel processes feedforward signals from orientation-selective neural units in V1; the model accounts for the shift from additivity to near-averaging with increase in line length as a consequence of the increased contribution of shunting.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call