Abstract

Accuracy is a popular measure for evaluating the performance of classification algorithms tested on ordinary data sets. When a data set is imbalanced, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">F</i> -measure will be a better choice than accuracy for this purpose. Since <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">F</i> -measure is calculated as the harmonic mean of recall and precision, it is difficult to find the sampling distribution of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">F</i> -measure for evaluating classification algorithms. Since the values of recall and precision are dependent, their joint distribution is assumed to follow a bivariate normal distribution in this study. When the evaluation method is <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">k</i> -fold cross validation, a linear approximation approach is proposed to derive the sampling distribution of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">F</i> -measure. This approach is used to design methods for comparing the performance of two classification algorithms tested on single or multiple imbalanced data sets. The methods are tested on ten imbalanced data sets to demonstrate their effectiveness. The weight of recall provided by this linear approximation approach can help us to analyze the characteristics of classification algorithms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call