Abstract

When two rough surfaces are loaded together contact occurs at asperity peaks. An interface of solid contact regions and air gaps is formed that is less stiff than the bulk material. The stiffness of a structure thus depends on the interface conditions; this is particularly critical when high stiffness is required, for example in precision systems such as machine tool spindles. The rough surface interface can be modelled as a distributed spring. For small deformation, the spring can be assumed to be linear; whilst for large deformations the spring gets stiffer as the amount of solid contact increases. One method to measure the spring stiffness, both the linear and nonlinear aspect, is by the reflection of ultrasound. An ultrasonic wave causes a perturbation of the contact and the reflection depends on the stiffness of the interface. In most conventional applications, the ultrasonic wave is low power, deformation is small and entirely elastic, and the linear stiffness is measured. However, if a high-powered ultrasonic wave is used, this changes the geometry of the contact and induces nonlinear response. In previous studies through transmission methods were used to measure the nonlinear interfacial stiffness. This approach is inconvenient for the study of machine elements where only one side of the interface is accessible. In this study a reflection method is undertaken, and the results are compared to existing experimental work with through transmission. The variation of both linear and nonlinear interfacial stiffnesses was measured as the nominal contact pressure was increased. In both cases interfacial stiffness was expressed as nonlinear differential equations and solved to deduce the contact pressure-relative surface approach relationships. The relationships derived from linear and nonlinear measurements were similar, indicating the validity of the presented methods.

Highlights

  • It can be seen that the reflection coefficient with increasing the nominal contact pressure due to increase in the real contact area

  • It can be seen that the reflection coefficient decreases with increasing the nominal contact pressure due to increase in the real contact area

  • The stiffness of a rough surface contact has been expressed in terms of a linear andwork, second order nonlinear stiffness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When two solid surfaces come into contact, it is the asperity peaks that touch, and the real area of contact is substantially less than the nominal contact area [1]. Applying a pressure to the surfaces causes a small approach of the mean lines of their roughness. The interfacial stiffness (per unit area) is defined as the rate of change of contact pressure with approach of the mean lines of the roughness of the contacting surfaces [2]. If the real contact area is low, a low nominal contact pressure is all that is required to deflect the asperities. Increasing the nominal contact pressure brings more asperities into contact and the interface becomes stiffer; interface stiffness is a nonlinear variable. For example, depends on the stiffness of the joints in the machine tool assembly [2]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call