Abstract
Linear and nonlinear free vibration analysis of functionally graded porous (FGP) nanobeam with four different porous distribution patterns is performed on the basis of stress-driven two-phase local/nonlocal integral model. The strain is defined according to von Karman nonlinearity, and the differential governing equations as well as standard boundary conditions are derived through the Hamilton’s principle. The integral relation between nonlinear strain and nonlocal stress is transformed equivalently into differential form with constitutive boundary conditions. Neglecting the nonlinear terms, the bending deflection and moment are derived and expressed explicitly through the Laplace transformation with six unknown constants for linear free vibration, and the nonlinear characteristic equation for vibration frequency and linear vibration mode shape can be calculated through standard and constitutive boundary conditions. Two analytic methods including Ritz–Galerkin and perturbation methods based on both local and nonlocal linear vibration mode shape are applied to study the linear and nonlinear free vibration of nonlocal FGP nanobeams under different boundary conditions Meanwhile, direct numerical method based on general differential quadrature method and Newton’s iterative process are utilized to obtain the numerical solutions of nonlinear vibration frequencies. The influence of nonlocal parameters and vibration amplitude on the free vibration frequencies is investigated numerically. The numerical results show that influence of nonlocal parameters on linear vibration mode shape is not significant. Local linear vibration mode shape based Ritz–Galerkin and perturbation methods would overestimate and underestimate the linear free vibration of nonlocal simply-supported and clamped–clamped nanobeams. Nonlocal linear vibration mode shape based Ritz–Galerkin and perturbation methods could provide more accurate prediction on nonlinear vibration frequencies than local mode shape based methods when W(0.5) is small. However, the relative error increases quickly with the increase of W(0.5). Based on the results obtained in this study, local and nonlocal linear vibration mode shape based Ritz–Galerkin and perturbation methods cannot provide accurate prediction on nonlinear vibration frequencies when the vibration magnitude is big, since linear vibration mode shape assumption is not suitable for strong nonlinear vibration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.