Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) uses vision, vestibular, and somatosensory information to maintain body stability. Research has shown that there is more lumbar proprioception error among low back pain (LBP) individuals as compared to healthy people. In this study, two groups of 20 healthy people and 20 non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) participants took part in this investigation. This investigation focused on somatosensory sensors and in order to alter proprioception, a vibrator (frequency of 70 Hz, amplitude of 0.5 mm) was placed on the soleus muscle area of each leg and two vibrators were placed bilaterally across the lower back muscles. Individuals, whose vision was occluded, were placed on two surfaces (foam and rigid) on force plate, and trunk angles were recorded simultaneously. Tests were performed in eight separate trials; the independent variables were vibration (four levels) and surface (two levels) for within subjects and two groups (healthy and LBP) for between subjects (4 × 2 × 2). MANOVA and multi-factor ANOVA tests were done. Linear parameters for center of pressure (COP) [deviation of amplitude, deviation of velocity, phase plane portrait (PPP), and overall mean velocity] and non-linear parameters for COP and trunk angle [recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) and Lyapunov exponents] were chosen as dependent variables. Results indicated that NSLBP individuals relied more on ankle proprioception for postural stability. Similarly, RQA parameters for the COP on both sides and for the trunk sagittal angle indicated more repeated patterns of movement among the LBP cohort. Analysis of short and long Lyapunov exponents showed that people with LBP caused no use of all joints in their bodies (non-flexible), are less stable than healthy subjects.

Highlights

  • Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a highly prevalent public health challenge with severe health and economic consequences worldwide. 60 to 80 percent of the world’s population experience at least one episode of low back pain (LBP) in their life time (Waddell, 1987; Burton et al, 1995; Méndez and Gómez-Conesa, 2001; Truchon, 2001), with 15% reporting pain in the acute range (Liebenson, 1996)

  • We investigated the classification of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) patients using specific questionnaires (Davoudi et al, 2020)

  • The linear analysis employed here revealed that the standard deviation of amplitude and velocity of the center of pressure (COP) were higher among the LBP group as compared to the healthy controls in both AP and ML directions, suggesting that the LBP patients experienced a greater challenge in using the hip control strategy to maintain stability instead of the ankle strategy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a highly prevalent public health challenge with severe health and economic consequences worldwide. 60 to 80 percent of the world’s population experience at least one episode of low back pain (LBP) in their life time (Waddell, 1987; Burton et al, 1995; Méndez and Gómez-Conesa, 2001; Truchon, 2001), with 15% reporting pain in the acute range (Liebenson, 1996). 60 to 80 percent of the world’s population experience at least one episode of low back pain (LBP) in their life time (Waddell, 1987; Burton et al, 1995; Méndez and Gómez-Conesa, 2001; Truchon, 2001), with 15% reporting pain in the acute range (Liebenson, 1996). Reports indicate that low back pain represents a prevalent limiting physical factor for adults under 45 years of age, and is considered as the most common cause of job-related disability and a key contributor to missed work days (Hart et al, 1995; Praemer et al, 1999). Prevalence of LBP has increased by more than 50% since 1990, and is projected to continue to increase specially in low and middle income countries (LMICs) where resources are limited and the lifestyle is rapidly becoming more sedentary (Clark and Horton, 2018). Several studies have been conducted to determine the causes of low back pain (Allegri et al, 2016), further prospective studies are needed to identify the potential risk factors for developing low back pain

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.