Abstract

Zero-determinant (ZD) strategies, a recently found novel class of strategies in repeated games, has attracted much attention in evolutionary game theory. A ZD strategy unilaterally enforces a linear relation between average payoffs of players. Although existence and evolutional stability of ZD strategies have been studied in simple games, their mathematical properties have not been well-known yet. For example, what happens when more than one players employ ZD strategies have not been clarified. In this paper, we provide a general framework for investigating situations where more than one players employ ZD strategies in terms of linear algebra. First, we theoretically prove that a set of linear relations of average payoffs enforced by ZD strategies always has solutions, which implies that incompatible linear relations are impossible. Second, we prove that linear payoff relations are independent of each other under some conditions. These results hold for general games with public monitoring including perfect-monitoring games. Furthermore, we provide a simple example of a two-player game in which one player can simultaneously enforce two linear relations, that is, simultaneously control her and her opponent’s average payoffs. All of these results elucidate general mathematical properties of ZD strategies.

Highlights

  • Game theory is a powerful framework explaining rational behaviors of human beings [1] and evolutionary behaviors of biological systems [2, 3]

  • ZD strategy unilaterally enforces a linear relation between average payoffs of players

  • As an application of linear algebraic formulation, we provide a simple example of a two-player game in which one player can simultaneously enforce two linear relations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Game theory is a powerful framework explaining rational behaviors of human beings [1] and evolutionary behaviors of biological systems [2, 3]. In a simple example of prisoner’s dilemma game, mutual defection is realized as a result of rational thought, even if mutual cooperation is more favorable. Axelrod’s famous tournaments on infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game [4, 5] showed that cooperative but retaliating strategy, called the tit-for-tat strategy, is successful in the setting of infinitely repeated game. ZD strategy unilaterally enforces a linear relation between average payoffs of players. A strategy which unilaterally sets her opponent’s average payoff (equalizer strategy) is one example. Another example is extortionate strategy in which the player can earn more average payoff than her opponent.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.