Abstract

An ultra-high-speed protective relay has been an important topic within the scientific community, and specifically within the power industry, for decades. The main drivers are the anticipated improvements in power system stability and power transfer capability which have become even more important with the increased penetration of renewable generation sources. The relay operate time is a relatively small part of the required improvement, since the circuit breaker interrupting time contributes the major part of the total fault clearing time. The first promising results in reducing the fault clearing time, from two or three cycles, down to one power system cycle, date back to 1976 when the relay operate time of 1.5 ms was achieved. Availability of sub-cycle breakers was anticipated in the early 1980-s. Nevertheless, almost forty years later, commercially viable 3/4 cycle breakers are still not available and their impact on the total fault clearing time has been omitted from most of the literature. The numerical relays operate time improvement has become the only goal and results are wrongly equalized with improvements in the total fault clearing time and directly correlated with improvements in power system stability. In this paper the real benefits of ultra-high-speed relay operate time are analyzed, considering the characteristics of the state-of-the-art circuit breakers and their interrupting time of 1.5-2 power system cycles (older circuit breakers are slower). A more holistic view, including interactions between protective relays and circuit breakers, as well as final benefits to utilities, is given in the paper.

Highlights

  • The requirement for ultra-high-speed relaying arises from the need for improvements in power system stability and increased power transmission capability

  • The main requirement for the fault clearance system (Fig.1) is to clear faults faster than the Critical Clearing Time (CCT), considering worst-case scenarios when the circuit breaker (CB) fails to break the current after receiving the trip command from the associated protective relay

  • The current interruption occurs again at the third zero-crossing, with identical FCT of 36.6 ms. It is that the faster operate time has not lead to a shorter FCT, but instead, the circuit breaker was exposed to much higher stresses since the arcing time was significantly longer (17.1 ms instead of 7.6 ms) causing higher wear of the CB arcing contacts which further contributes to the reduction of its service lifetime [7], [16]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The requirement for ultra-high-speed relaying arises from the need for improvements in power system stability and increased power transmission capability. The main requirement for the fault clearance system (Fig.1) is to clear faults faster than the CCT, considering worst-case scenarios when the CB fails to break the current after receiving the trip command from the associated protective relay In such situations a dedicated Breaker Failure Protection (BFP) scheme is used to ensure fault clearing within CCT by opening adjacent breakers in the power system (Fig.). It is that the faster operate time has not lead to a shorter FCT, but instead, the circuit breaker was exposed to much higher stresses since the arcing time was significantly longer (17.1 ms instead of 7.6 ms) causing higher wear of the CB arcing contacts which further contributes to the reduction of its service lifetime [7], [16] For this reason, the relay operate time is not relevant by itself; only the fault clearing time has a meaningful effect on the rest of the power system.

FAULT CLEARING TIME EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
FAULT CLEARING TIME IMPROVEMENTS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE POWER SYSTEM
VIII. CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.