Abstract

LINE-1 (L1) elements are the most abundant autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in the human genome. Having recently performed a meta-analysis of L1 endonuclease-mediated retrotranspositional events causing human genetic disease, we have extended this study by focusing on two key issues, namely, mutation detection bias and the multiplicity of mechanisms of target gene disruption. Our analysis suggests that whereas an ascertainment bias may have generally militated against the detection of autosomal L1-mediated insertions, autosomal L1 direct insertions could have been disproportionately overlooked owing to their unusually large size. Our analysis has also indicated that the mechanisms underlying the functional disruption of target genes by L1-mediated retrotranspositional events are likely to be dependent on several different factors such as the type of insertion (L1 direct, L1 trans-driven Alu, or SVA), the precise locations of the inserted sequences within the target gene regions, the length of the inserted sequences, and possibly also their orientation.

Highlights

  • LINE-1 or L1 elements account for ∼ 17% of the human genome sequence [1]

  • Mutation detection bias is a complex issue. This notwithstanding, our analysis has suggested that at least two factors may have contributed to a significant bias in detecting L1-mediated retrotranspositional events that cause human genetic disease

  • There is a general tendency for autosomal L1-mediated insertions to be overlooked, autosomal L1 direct insertions appear likely to be the most seriously underestimated owing to their unusually large size

Read more

Summary

Review Article

LINE-1 Endonuclease-Dependent Retrotranspositional Events Causing Human Genetic Disease: Mutation Detection Bias and Multiple Mechanisms of Target Gene Disruption. Having recently performed a meta-analysis of L1 endonuclease-mediated retrotranspositional events causing human genetic disease, we have extended this study by focusing on two key issues, namely, mutation detection bias and the multiplicity of mechanisms of target gene disruption. Our analysis has indicated that the mechanisms underlying the functional disruption of target genes by L1-mediated retrotranspositional events are likely to be dependent on several different factors such as the type of insertion (L1 direct, L1 trans-driven Alu, or SVA), the precise locations of the inserted sequences within the target gene regions, the length of the inserted sequences, and possibly their orientation

INTRODUCTION
MUTATION DETECTION DISPLAYS A SIGNIFICANT BIAS
PCR Southern blotting
DMD FCMD
Mutations in HGMDe
MULTIPLE MECHANISMS OF TARGET GENE DISRUPTION
Alu insertions
SVA insertions
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call