Linda S. Cordell (1943–2013)

American AnthropologistVolume 67, Issue 5 p. 1258-1277 Free Access Leslie Spier 1893–1961 Harry W. Basehart, Harry W. Basehart University of New Mexico, AlbuquerqueSearch for more papers by this authorW. W. Hill, W. W. Hill University of New Mexico, AlbuquerqueSearch for more papers by this author Harry W. Basehart, Harry W. Basehart University of New Mexico, AlbuquerqueSearch for more papers by this authorW. W. Hill, W. W. Hill University of New Mexico, AlbuquerqueSearch for more papers by this author First published: October 1965 https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.5.02a00090Citations: 2AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Cited Dixon, Roland B. 1928 The building of cultures. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons. Bennett, John W. 1944 The development of ethnological theory as illustrated by studies of the Plains sun dance. American Anthropologist 46: 162– 181. Clements, Forrest 1931 Plains Indian tribal correlations with sun dance data. American Anthropologist 33: 216– 227. Driver, H. E. and A. L. Kroeber 1932 Quantitative expression of cultural relationships. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. Vol. 31. Forde, C. Daryll 1930 Review: Havasupai ethnography. American Anthropologist 32: 553– 556. Herskovits, Melville J. 1948 Man and his works: the science of cultural anthropology. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Lowie, Robert H. 1920 Primitive society. New York, Boni and Liveright. Morgan, L. H. 1871 Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge 17. Service, Elman 1947 Recent observations on Havasupai land tenure. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 43: 360– 366. Spier, Leslie 1915 Blackfoot relationship terms. American Anthropologist 17: 581– 582. Spier, Leslie 1918 The Trenton Argillite Culture. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History 22: 167– 226. Spier, Leslie 1921 The sun dance of the Plains Indians: its development and diffusion. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History 16: 451– 527. Spier, Leslie 1922 A suggested origin for gentile organization. American Anthropologist 24: 487– 489. Spier, Leslie 1925 The distribution of kinship systems in North America. University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 1: 69– 88. Spier, Leslie 1928 Havasupai ethnography. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History 29: 81– 392. Spier, Leslie 1929a Review: The building of cultures. Roland B. Dixon. American Anthropologist 31: 140– 145. Spier, Leslie 1929b Problems arising from the cultural position of the Havasupai. American Anthropologist 31: 213– 222. Spier, Leslie 1930 Klamath ethnography. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 30: 1– 338. Spier, Leslie 1931 Historical interrelation of culture traits: Franz Boas' study of Tsimshian mythology. In Methods in social science, Stuart A. Rice, ed., Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Spier, Leslie 1933 Yuman tribes of the Gila river. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Spier, Leslie 1935 The prophet dance of the northwest and its derivatives. General Series in Anthropology 1. Spier, Leslie 1936 Cultural relations of the Gila river and lower Colorado tribes. Yale University Publications in Anthropology 3: 1– 22. Spier, Leslie 1938 Preface. The Sinkaietk or southern Okanagon of Washington. Walter B. Cline and Others. General Series in Anthropology 6. Spier, Leslie 1954 Some aspects of the nature of culture. First annual research lecture, University of New Mexico 1– 21. Spier, Leslie 1959 Some central elements in the legacy. In The anthropology of Franz Boas, Walter Goldschmidt, ed. American Anthropological Association, Memoir 89: 148– 155. Wissler, Clark 1926 The relation of nature to man in aboriginal America. New York, Oxford University Press. Citing Literature Volume67, Issue5October 1965Pages 1258-1277 ReferencesRelatedInformation

MUSEUMS AND AMERICAN INDIAN: LEGAL ASPECTS OF REPATRIATION

Wilson D. Wallis 1886-1970

The Modern Language JournalVolume 63, Issue 5-6 p. 250-257 Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Interlanguage, and Other Useful Fads* Bernard Spolsky, Bernard Spolsky University of New Mexico Bernard J. Spolsky (Ph.D., University of Montreal) is Professor of Linguistics, Anthropology, and Elementary Education at the University of New Mexico and is currently also Dean of the Graduate School. He is author of Educational Linguistics: An Introduction, editor of The Language Education of Minority Children: Selected Readings, and co-editor of Frontiers of Bilingual Education and Case Studies in Bilingual Education.Search for more papers by this author Bernard Spolsky, Bernard Spolsky University of New Mexico Bernard J. Spolsky (Ph.D., University of Montreal) is Professor of Linguistics, Anthropology, and Elementary Education at the University of New Mexico and is currently also Dean of the Graduate School. He is author of Educational Linguistics: An Introduction, editor of The Language Education of Minority Children: Selected Readings, and co-editor of Frontiers of Bilingual Education and Case Studies in Bilingual Education.Search for more papers by this author First published: September‐October 1979 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1979.tb02454.xCitations: 2 ‡ Paper presented at the Fifth International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Montreal, August 21–26, 1978. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume63, Issue5-6September‐October 1979Pages 250-257 RelatedInformation

At the New Mexico Center for Environmental Health Sciences (NMCEHS), community concerns and relationships are as much at the center’s foundation as the latest research techniques. According to center director Scott Burchiel, the unique populations of New Mexico—including a high number of Hispanics and Native American tribes, pueblos, and sovereign nations—steer the center’s course. “One of the things we have tried to do is to determine what these populations’ concerns are for environmental health, because we want our center to be focused on environmental public health, and we want to work on basic research projects that address issues that people in this region are particularly interested in,” he says. Based in Albuquerque as a partnership of The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center and the Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute (LRRI), the NIEHS-funded center comprises major research cores in environmental cancer and oxidative stress, cardiovascular toxicology, environmental lung disease, and population health and epidemiology. The center also includes world-class facility cores (particularly for inhalation toxicology), a pilot project program to provide funding for small innovative research studies, and an unusually strong community outreach and education program (COEP). Community input is essential, as is trust. “We have investigators who may have certain interests for certain kinds of projects and want to work with communities,” says Burchiel. “But when we go to the community, we find out that [the community has] a different agenda, different interests. We’ve been learning how to work with communities since we’ve had this environmental health center.” It’s a process that involves a lot of development of community relationships and trust relationships. Burchiel says that investigating environmental health problems such as asthma requires a broad definition of environment. He says, “In our center, we define the environment quite broadly. It includes nutritional, social, behavioral, economic, and built environment components. . . . We have not only environmental epidemiologists [but] also social epidemiologists who help us look at social factors in assessing economic and poverty factors.”

Why Intensive Agriculturalists Have Higher Fertility: A Household Energy Budget Approach

WILLIAM HENRY HOLMES

Women’s health is community health

History and Approaches to Heritage Studies, Pedagogy and Practice in Heritage Studies

American AnthropologistVolume 41, Issue 2 p. 223-244 Free Access FURTHER NOTES ON BASKET MAKER III SANDALS FROM NORTHEASTERN ARIZONA GORDON C. BALDWIN, GORDON C. BALDWIN Arizona State Museum Tucson, ArizonaSearch for more papers by this author GORDON C. BALDWIN, GORDON C. BALDWIN Arizona State Museum Tucson, ArizonaSearch for more papers by this author First published: April‐June 1939 https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1939.41.2.02a00030Citations: 5AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Bibliography Alexander, Hubert G., and Reiter, Paxil. 1935. Report on the Excavation of Jemez Cave' New Mexico (Monograph of the University of New Mexico and the School of American Research, No. 4, Santa Fe). Baldwin, Gordon C. 1938a. Basket Maker and Pueblo Sandals (Southwestern Lore, Vol. IV, No. 1, pp. 1– 6, Gunnison). 1938b. An Analysis of Basket Maker III sandals from Northeastern Arizona (American Anthropologist, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 465– 485, Menasha). Cornelius, Olive Frazier. 1938. Basket Maker Sandals (?) (Southwestern Lore, Vol. III, No. 4, pp. 74– 78, Gunnison). Cummings, Byron. 1910. Ancient Inhabitants of the San Juan Valley (Bulletin, University of Utah, 2nd Archaeological Number, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pt. 2, Salt Lake). 1915. The Textile Fabrics of the Cliff Dwellers (reprint of paper presented before the National Association of Cotton Manufacturers, April 28–29, 1915, Boston). Douglass, A. E. 1935. Dating Pueblo Bonito and Other Ruins of the Southwest (National Geographic Society, Contributed Technical Papers, Pueblo Bonito Series, No. 1, Washington). 1936. Central Pueblo Chronology (Tree Ring Bulletin, Vol. II, No. 4, Flagstaff). Fewkes, J. Walter. 1909. Antiquities of the Mesa Verde National Park: Spruce Tree House (Bulletin, Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 41, Washington). 1911. Antiquities of the Mesa Verde National Park: Cliff Palace (Bulletin, Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 51, Washington). Gladwin, Harold S. 1937. Excavations at Snaketown, II. Comparisons and Theories (Medallion Papers, No. 26, Globe). Guernsey, S. J. 1931. Explorations in Northeastern Arizona (Papers, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 12, No. 1, Cambridge). Guernsey, S. J., and Kidder, A. V. 1921. Basket Maker Caves of Northeastern Arizona (Papers, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 8, No. 2, Cambridge). Haury, Emil W. 1934. The Canyon Creek Ruin and the Cliff Dwellings of the Sierra Ancha (Medallion Papers, No. 14, Globe). 1936. Vandal Cave (The Kiva, Vol. 1, No. 6, Tucson). Hough, Walter, 1914. Culture of the Ancient Pueblos of the Upper Gila River Region, New Mexico and Arizona (Bulletin 87, United States National Museum, Washington ). Judd, Neil M. 1924. Two Chaco Canyon Pit Houses (Smithsonian Report for 1922, pp. 399– 413, Washington ). Kidder, A. V. 1924. An Introduction to the Study of Southwestern Archaeology, with a Preliminary Account of the Excavations at Pecos (Papers, Southwestern Expedition, Phillips Academy, Andover, No. 1, New Haven). 1926. A Sandal from Northeastern Arizona (American Anthropologist, Vol. 28, pp. 618– 632). Kidder, A. V., and Guernsey, S. J. 1919. Archaeological Explorations in Northeastern Arizona (Bulletin, Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 65, Washington). Morris, Earl H. 1919a. Preliminary Account of the Antiquities of the Region Between the Mancos and La Plata Rivers in Southwestern Colorado (Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 33, pp. 157– 205, Washington. 1919b. The Aztec Ruin (Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 26, Pt. 1, New York). 1925. Exploring in the Canyon of Death (National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 263– 300, Washington). 1928. An Aboriginal Salt Mine at Camp Verde, Arizona (Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 30, Pt. 3, New York). 1936. Archaeological Background of Dates in Early Arizona Chronology (Tree Ring Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 4, Flagstaff). Morss, Noel H. 1927. Archaeological Explorations in the Middle Chinlee (Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, No. 34, Menasha). Nusbaum, J. L. 1922. A Basket-Maker Cave in Kane County, Utah; With Notes on the Artifacts by A. V. Kidder and S. J. Guernsey (Indian Notes and Monographs, Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, New York). Pepper, G. H. 1920. Pueblo Bonito (Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 27, New York). Roberts, Frank H. H., Jr. 1929. Recent Archaeological Developments in the Vicinity of El Paso, Texas (Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 81, No. 7, Washington). 1935. A Survey of Southwestern Archaeology (American Anthropologist, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1– 35, Menasha). Sayles, E. B. 1935. An Archaeological Survey of Texas (Medallion Papers, No. 17, Globe). Zingg, Robert M. 1938. The Southwestern Affiliations of Tarahumara Culture (Southwestern Lore, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 6– 9, Gunnison). Citing Literature Volume41, Issue2April‐June 1939Pages 223-244 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Why an open access publishing cooperative can work

References Cited

Resolution of Respect: Paul Risser, 1939–2014

Lewis R. Binford (b. 1931–d. 2011) was an American archaeologist who had a profound impact on the thinking and practice of archaeology worldwide. Binford held degrees from the University of North Carolina (BA 1957), and the University of Michigan (MA 1958, PhD 1964). From 1962 through 1968 he held multiple academic appointments, his brief stays a result of several factors, not least Binford’s powerful personality and enthusiasm for confronting archaeological orthodoxy. From 1968 to 1991 he was on the faculty of the University of New Mexico, after which he served as a distinguished professor at Southern Methodist University. He retired in 2003. In the early 1960s Binford issued a call for archaeology to become more anthropological and more scientific, and to seek the processes by which cultures adapted and changed. His efforts gave rise to the “New Archaeology” (later called “processual archaeology”), and in the ensuing decade it dominated discussions of archaeological theory and method. Although many shared the goals of the movement, differences quickly emerged as to how to achieve those goals. Binford himself grew disillusioned with what the New Archaeology was becoming, and with his own efforts to understand patterns in the archaeological record. How could one learn, from a static archaeological record in the present, about the dynamic systems that produced that record in the past? Archaeologists needed to develop a “middle range” theory, he argued, to learn from present dynamic systems and their material correlates, in order to infer past dynamics from present archaeological statics. Toward that end, he conducted ethnoarchaeological research to better understand how foragers adapted to a landscape, organized their technology, and targeted their prey. The research results, published rapid-fire in the late 1970s and the 1980s, caused a sea change in archaeological hunter-gatherer studies; introduced influential analytical measures for understanding how foragers procured, processed, and consumed prey; and helped tease apart the natural and cultural processes that affect material in a site. The effort, in turn, led Binford to question received wisdom about early human cultural evolution, most notably the role of hunting in human evolution. His ideas shook up paleoanthropology and were much debated in the 1980s and 1990s. So too were his ideas about an archaeological science. Post-processualists dismissed the idea that archaeology could be an objective science, arguing instead for a more historically constituted approach. These and other debates engaged much of Binford’s attention in his last decades, but throughout he continued his efforts to understand hunter-gatherer adaptations. Over his career he was the recipient of four honorary doctorates and multiple awards, including the Huxley Memorial Medal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, the Society for American Archaeology Lifetime Achievement Award, and election to the British Academy and to the National Academy of Sciences.

For more than four decades, Patricia Crown, a professor of anthropology at the University of New Mexico, has conducted field investigations in the Ancestral Pueblo, Mogollon, and Hohokam areas of the American Southwest. Her work has revealed important aspects of these cultures concerning ceramics, trade, rituals, diet, gender roles, and more. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2014, Crown five years earlier uncovered the first evidence of chocolate consumption in North America north of Mexico. Crown has also conducted an extensive analysis of organic residues from archaeological sites in the US Southwest and the Mexican Northwest, revealing widespread use of cacao and holly in communal, ritual gatherings dating from AD 750 to 1400. Portrait of Patricia Crown. Image courtesy of Wirt H. Wills (photographer). Excavations in room 28 of Pueblo Bonito; Patricia Crown is in the orange vest. Image courtesy of Wirt H. Wills (photographer). Crown’s father was an art professor at the University of Southern California, as well as a landscape painter. “He did most of his painting outside and often took his three children along,” Crown says, adding that her mother, a public school teacher, was also an artist, as were her two older sisters. “I had no talent for painting,” she says, “and so had to amuse myself in other ways.” One diversion was searching for artifacts during summer family camping trips to places in the American Southwest. It was during one such trip to New Mexico when 15-year-old Crown decided to become an archaeologist after years of being intrigued by landscapes and ruins. She says, “My parents both encouraged me to do whatever I was passionate about, and that was archaeology. So I read everything I could get my hands on and only applied to colleges that had good archaeology programs.” Crown chose the …