Abstract

With the large diversity in energy harvesters aiming to extract maximum power from broadband excitations, it is important to know what the maximum power achievable is. This paper derives new upper bounds on the available power for a harvester with general nonlinear stiffness coupled to a nonlinear electrical circuit. White noise base excitations are known to input power proportional to the total oscillating mass of the system and the magnitude of the spectral density of the noise regardless of the details of the oscillating system. This power is split between undesirable mechanical damping and useful electrical dissipation with the form of the stiffness profile and device parameters determining the relative proportions in each dissipation mechanism. An upper bound on electrical power is sought and, provided certain conditions are met, shown to be a simple function of relatively few system parameters and, importantly, independent of the stiffness profile or electrical nonlinearity.The benefits of knowing the upper limits on power are threefold: to guide optimal harvester design, to assess how close to optimal current devices are and to provide a preliminary estimation of the harvester mass necessary in a given operating environment for a given power requirement.

Highlights

  • As technology develops, the power consumption of electronic devices is decreasing rapidly

  • The ability of an energy harvester to extract the maximum power from a given excitation will strongly depend on the characteristics of the excitation

  • A large proportion of applications will be dominated by harmonic vibrations at one or more fixed or time-varying frequencies and substantial research has been undertaken to develop optimal energy harvesters under these conditions [3,5,6,7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The power consumption of electronic devices is decreasing rapidly. For white noise base acceleration, it has been shown that the power harvested is proportional to the oscillating mass and the noise intensity and independent of the system used to dissipate it This result has been partially shown or derived for simple or specific systems in a number of ways [10,11,14,15,16], but the most general and complete proof is that of [8], extended in [9].

An upper bound on power harvested
Example 1: linear resistance and stiffness
Example 3: cubic resistance asymmetric nonlinear stiffness
Optimal device design
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.