Limits on the application of additive factors logic: Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

This study aimed to establish whether the logic of the AFM applies when multielement stimuli contain relevant and irrelevant elements. Target Size (TS) and symbolic S-R Compatibility (SRC) were manipulated in three reaction time (RT) experiments. TS and SRC are assumed in the AFM literature to selectively influence the independent stages of feature extraction and S-R translation, respectively. Experiment 1 showed that the effects of TS and SRC on RT were additive when the target was presented in isolation and this additive relation was not changed when the target was flanked by stimuli that contained no information relevant to the response. In Experiment 2, this additivity changed into a superadditive interaction when flankers signaled the same response as the target: The effect of SRC was larger when targets were small rather than large. The overall pattern of findings violated the AFM stage robustness criterion. Neither a discrete stage model nor a continuous flow conception account for the results. To explain flanker effects on target processing a dual-process architecture was formulated that assumes that perceptual information is processed along concurrently engaged routes: An attentive processing route and a direct priming route. Experiment 3 confirmed the prediction of the dual-process model that the relation between TS and SRC would be subadditive when flankers signal the response opposite to that designated by the target.