Abstract

The unsuitability of the “CFU” parameter and the usefulness of cultivation-independent quantification of Campylobacter on chicken products, reflecting the actual risk for infection, is increasingly becoming obvious. Recently, real-time PCR methods in combination with the use of DNA intercalators, which block DNA amplification from dead bacteria, have seen wide application. However, much confusion exists in the correct interpretation of such assays. Campylobacter is confronted by oxidative and cold stress outside the intestine. Hence, damage caused by oxidative stress probably represents the most frequent natural death of Campylobacter on food products. Treatment of Campylobacter with peroxide led to complete loss of CFU and to significant entry of any tested DNA intercalator, indicating disruption of membrane integrity. When we transiently altered the metabolic state of Campylobacter by abolishing the proton-motive force or by inhibiting active efflux, CFU was constant but enhanced entry of ethidium bromide (EtBr) was observed. Consistently, ethidium monoazide (EMA) also entered viable Campylobacter, in particular when nutrients for bacterial energization were lacking (in PBS) or when the cells were less metabolically active (in stationary phase). In contrast, propidium iodide (PI) and propidium monoazide (PMA) were excluded from viable bacterial cells, irrespective of their metabolic state. As expected for a diffusion-limited process, the extent of signal reduction from dead cells depended on the temperature, incubation time and concentration of the dyes during staining, prior to crosslinking. Consistently, free protein and/or DNA present in varying amounts in the heterogeneous matrix lowered the concentration of the DNA dyes at the bacterial membrane and led to considerable variation of the residual signal from dead cells. In conclusion, we propose an improved approach, taking into account principles of method variability and recommend the implementation of process sample controls for reliable quantification of intact and potentially infectious units (IPIU) of Campylobacter by real-time PCR.

Highlights

  • Quantitative detection of Campylobacter is one of the most relevant issues for quality control of poultry products

  • 50% of the cells were stained with propidium iodide after 40–48 h of growth, indicating some loss of membrane integrity but not explaining the magnitude of loss of colony forming units (CFU) formation

  • Previous data revealed an apparent huge discrepancy between the detection of viable bacteria by direct plating compared to enrichment, with respect to prevalence estimation in fresh chicken at retail

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantitative detection of Campylobacter is one of the most relevant issues for quality control of poultry products. A viable Campylobacter forms a colony on an agar plate. The ISO method 10272-2 detects colony forming units (CFU) per g or ml of sample material and is quite useful when applied to fresh samples (e.g. from the slaughterhouse), where Campylobacter just exited the intestine, the site of bacterial proliferation. The quantitative detection of the bacterial pathogen on poultry meat at retail is largely hampered by loss of in vitro culturability of Campylobacter due to cold and oxygen stress [1]. Whereas nearly 50% of all samples of German fresh chicken meat at retail were positive after enrichment (and probably recovery of transiently inactive Campylobacter), less than 5% of these samples were detected as Campylobacter-positive by direct plating (quantitative method) [2]. A culture-independent method for quantification of viable Campylobacter in food is indispensable for food control

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.