Abstract

Cultural differences in speech acts are common challenges in management involving Chinese and Western managers. Comparing four groups – Native-speaking Chinese, English-speaking Chinese, Chinese-speaking Westerners, and non-Chinese- speaking Westerners, we assessed the effects of language and ethnicity on the ability to predict communication obstacles in a management team scenario. Bilingual subjects were less likely to be influenced by ethnic biases. Still, bilinguals were not more likely to adjust their metacognitions about communication toward those of the native speakers. The study creates a link between management, cognition and linguistics, as well as having consequences for the study of metacognition in cross-cultural management.

Highlights

  • Communication plays a crucial role in management (Mintzberg, 2009), and it is even seen as what organization is “about” (Weick, 1995)

  • The aim of this study is to explore how differences in managerial communication may be influenced by cognitive structures related to language, but on a more profound level than what is covered by learning a foreign language (Henrich et al, 2010; Jentjens, 2021)

  • We have focused on one specific situation in which a Western expat CEO who has newly arrived in China tries to stimulate his top management team to an open exchange of viewpoints and ideas about the company’s present challenges

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Communication plays a crucial role in management (Mintzberg, 2009), and it is even seen as what organization is “about” (Weick, 1995). The ability to understand these differences and have meta-cognitive perceptions of them may not develop until the speakers acquire almost native levels of mastery in the foreign language, and still cause misunderstandings among people who have business-level understanding of each other’s language (Wang et al, 2014; Beeler and Lecomte, 2017). This field of study is an important borderline between native and corporate cultures because most cultural obstacles need to be sorted out in verbal interaction for organizations to overcome them (Wilkinson et al, 2005; Pavlenko, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.