Abstract
In an 11 month period, 95 patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage underwent early fiberoptic endoscopy. Patients were randomized into two groups before endoscopy depending on whether the results of the procedure were revealed immediately or after 4 days. No attempt was made to influence the treatment or diagnostic plan. The groups were comparable with respect to historical features surrounding the bleeding episode and the anatomic site of hemorrhage. There were no significant differences in any aspect of patient management or outcome between groups. Important changes in diagnostic or treatment plan were made after learning the results of endoscopy in only 12 percent of the patients, half of whom were bleeding briskly at the time of endoscopy. It is concluded that the natural history of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (for example, the spontaneous cessation of bleeding) precludes endoscopy from having a significant effect on patient management.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
