Abstract

Although high-dose therapy is considered the standard therapy for younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM), the advantages of performing a second transplant remain debated. The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of a front-line double transplant program in young MM patients. A total of 153 MM patients aged <or=65 years, the majority of whom had stage III disease (65%), were enrolled in a multicenter, nonrandomized, high-dose program including 2 transplants. The percentage of good quality responses (complete and very good partial responses) increased from an initial 33% after induction to 91% (complete response rate of 29%) after 2 transplants. However, this increase in response did not produce an advantage in either event-free survival or overall survival, even when the analysis was performed grouping patients by response. The protocol was well tolerated and no difference in transplant-related mortality was observed between the first and second transplants. A first transplant was performed in 122 of 153 patients (80%), and 65 (42% of the enrolled patients) completed the double transplant program. Reasons for not undergoing the second autologous transplant were death (n=2 patients), insufficient peripheral blood stem cells (n=8 patients), severe transplant-related toxicity (n=10 patients), allotransplants (n=9 patients), early progression after first transplant (n=6 patients), lost to follow-up (n=3 patients), and patient refusal (n=19 patients). Considering the limited advantage of double transplants, the complexity of the program, the high percentage of dropouts, and the additional costs of a second transplant, the current study favors single transplant programs for the treatment of younger MM patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.