Abstract
AbstractThis paper studies the cost of limited commitment when a central bank commits to a price‐level target path but retains the discretion to re‐optimize it whenever the cost of honouring its commitment exceeds a tolerance threshold. Such discretion undermines the credibility of the price‐level target path and weakens its effectiveness to stabilize the economy. Endogenous target resets are more costly than exogenous target re‐optimizations and can give rise to multiple equilibria, including a low credibility equilibrium with frequent target resets and high volatility. Canadian data suggest that price‐level target resets could be quite frequent in practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.