Abstract

AbstractRelationships between readings of the electronic (capacitance) pasture meter and descriptions of pasture yield were examined over the yearly growth cycle in grazed pastures of Setaria anceps cv. Nandi, with or without Macroptilium atropurpurem cv. Siratro and Desmodium intortum cv. Greenleaf. There was a poor relationship between meter reading and pasture dry matter yield (r =+0.574 pooled over pastures and seasons) but this relationship was improved to r=+0.750 by inclusion of other regressors describing pasture height and proportion of inert material. Meter reading was more closely related to fresh pasture yield (r =+0.830), water yield (r =+0.885) or dried green yield (r =+0.830), although inclusion of a pasture height term still improved the relationship slightly. Suggestions are made about using the meter to estimate dried green yield rather than total dry matter yield, and taking more consideration of the proportion of inert material when relating the meter reading to total dry matter yield.Visual estimation was also compared with actual pasture yield measured by cutting. Even though prior training for yield estimation was inadequate, the relationships between visually estimated and actual yield were as good as those from the pasture meter. It is concluded that the pasture meter will not find a regular use as a sampling tool in most grazed tropical pastures.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.